Re: Uncle Al STOP!!!
From: Mark Tarka (mark_tarka_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/26/04
- Next message: Steven Sharp: "Re: fission question"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Getting back to basics"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Uncle Al STOP!!!"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Uncle Al STOP!!!"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Uncle Al STOP!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Jul 2004 15:26:55 -0700
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<41050742.63DE8C05@hate.spam.net>...
> "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:
> >
> > Dear Uncle Al:
> >
> > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
> > news:410425F7.8E0DBC9C@hate.spam.net...
> > > "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:
> > > > You didn't ask for mine, but I'll give them to you anyway. ;>)
> > > > If gravitational mass = rest mass, then he may have more "moles" in one
[snip ...]
> If I were the universe, gravitation would
> have a parity anomaly to keep things interesting. We'll see.
Have a time-table for the experiment's debut
to share with the feeble-minded?
Mark
- Next message: Steven Sharp: "Re: fission question"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Getting back to basics"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Uncle Al STOP!!!"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Uncle Al STOP!!!"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Uncle Al STOP!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]