Re: fission question
From: Steven Sharp (sharp_at_cadence.com)
Date: 07/26/04
- Next message: Ron Hardin: "Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture"
- Previous message: Mark Tarka: "Re: Uncle Al STOP!!!"
- In reply to: puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com: "Re: fission question"
- Next in thread: puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com: "Re: fission question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Jul 2004 15:29:55 -0700
puppet_sock@hotmail.com wrote in message news:<c7976c46.0407260611.62276699@posting.google.com>...
>
> Horseback feeling from experience with commercial nuclear fuel:
> A core such as this, in five seconds, would be fairly accurately
> treated as adiabatic.
Certainly the models in the Los Alamos report assumed this.
> I'm thinking, though, that a significant fraction of the energy
> would have gone away as neutrons that didn't interact with the
> core.
With plutonium, you get 2 spare neutrons from each fission. A typical
fission neutron has around 2 MeV. Fission releases around 180 MeV.
So only around 2% of the fission energy could be carried away by neutrons.
- Next message: Ron Hardin: "Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture"
- Previous message: Mark Tarka: "Re: Uncle Al STOP!!!"
- In reply to: puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com: "Re: fission question"
- Next in thread: puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com: "Re: fission question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|