Re: Uncle Al STOP!!!

From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 07/26/04 

Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:15:36 -0500

Mark Tarka wrote:
>
> Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<41050742.63DE8C05@hate.spam.net>...
> > "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Uncle Al:
> > >
> > > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
> > > news:410425F7.8E0DBC9C@hate.spam.net...
> > > > "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:
> > > > > You didn't ask for mine, but I'll give them to you anyway. ;>)
> > > > > If gravitational mass = rest mass, then he may have more "moles" in one
> [snip ...]
> > If I were the universe, gravitation would
> > have a parity anomaly to keep things interesting. We'll see.
>
> Have a time-table for the experiment's debut
> to share with the feeble-minded?

Not yet. It's hurry up and wait. I spent the weekend shooting
out data to the three groups. Petitjean is jazzed about a
reduction to practice.

A Mark III Eotvos rotor is good to 0.1 in 10^12
difference/average at 1-sigma. 0.1 in 10^12 would be 8% of the
enthalpy of fusion of benzil when the parity mass disparity comes
out as mc^2. It's competitive. Hell, it's better and much
faster. Though a chemist has the equipment, it's a physics
experiment. Makes you want to scream. 

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf