Re: Cold Fusion

From: Tom Potter (tdp_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 07/27/04 

Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:28:13 +0800

"Prai Jei" <pvstownsend@zyx-abc.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ce0tt3$2f6$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Tom Potter (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message
> <2mh10hFmqubbU8@uni-berlin.de>:
>
> > [Snip all except Nos. 1 and 2 from each list]
> > Imagine a hierarchy of objects as follows:
> > 1. Null
> > 2. Particle
> >
> > And next imagine a field associated with each
> > object hierarchy has an intensity that is a function of the
> > number of the contiguous objects in that class.
> > 1. F(0) - Null ( Space field "1" )
> > 2. F(1) - Particle ( Weak force field )
> >
> > And next imagine that other objects
> > of the same class are affected by this field,
> > and have a physical property "P(N)".
> > 1. P(0) - Null ( Distance "Space^0 and space^5" )
> > 2. P(1) - Particle ( Unnamed weak force property)
> >
>
> How certain are you that your No. 2's are the immediate next level above
> your No. 1's?
>
> It's one of my pet hypotheses that between Null (whatever you conceive
that
> to be) and any named concrete level, there is an infinite hierarchy of
> levels in between.
> --
> Paul Townsend

I tend to agree with you.

There probably is "an infinite hierarchy of levels in between"
the object classes, and the number of levels
is limited by man's perception,
and his need to limit the number of
object classes to some workable number.

Current theory (Dirac)
allows for a jump between null and fermions,
and more precisely the electron.

There is enough information floating around to
describe several other "fields" F(N)
along with the field's associated "property" P(N).
(For complex molecules, planetary systems, gallacies, etc.)

And no doubt,
the central features,
of all sets of objects are nebulous things,
that are constantly shifting.

For example, man's definition of the set mankind,
is subject to drift.

This drift would, in affect,
fill in between any two set definitions
fixed at some point in time and space,
and smear object sets into a continium.

What also validates your position
is the fact that certain bipolar properties
are minimized in each object class
( For example charge in atoms, and magnetic moment in nuclei.)
and this suggests that even the most fundamental objects
that we can perceive arise in bipolar pairs,
as Dirac indicated.

It is easy to imagine a population of objects becoming extinct,
or an object combining with an "anti-object"
and converted into pure space, but
it is hard to imagine how a population of objects
arises from nothing. 

--
Tom Potter     http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cold Fusion
    ... > Tom Potter wrote thusly in message ... >> And next imagine a field associated with each ... There probably is "an infinite hierarchy of levels in between" ... is the fact that certain bipolar properties ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: List of Cranks here
    ... Tom Potter wrote: ... > Now I can imagine people with hidden, or anti-social agendas, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Cold Fusion
    ... Tom Potter wrote thusly in message ... Particle ... > And next imagine a field associated with each ... > object hierarchy has an intensity that is a function of the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Cold Fusion
    ... Tom Potter wrote thusly in message ... Particle ... > And next imagine a field associated with each ... > object hierarchy has an intensity that is a function of the ...
    (sci.math)