Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?
From: Richard Tobin (richard_at_cogsci.ed.ac.uk)
Date: 07/29/04
- Next message: Jeff Relf: "_ SHOULD _ Have No Back Reference."
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Reply: Spaceman: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Jul 2004 22:19:17 GMT
In article <41097654.48E53BE1@mchsi.com>,
Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote:
> 186,000 miles/second + 186,000 miles/second = 186282.024 miles/second
I don't think that's a good way to put it. 186,000 miles/second +
186,000 miles/second = 372,000 miles/second. It's just that addition
is not the right way to determine relative speeds of physical objects.
If you point two lasers at the moon and move them so that the spots move
186,000 miles/second in opposite directions, the distance between them
changes at 372,000 miles/second.
-- Richard
- Next message: Jeff Relf: "_ SHOULD _ Have No Back Reference."
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Reply: Spaceman: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|