Re: The ultimate luxury ?
From: Eric Gisse (fseggNOSPAM_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Spaceman: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: Eddie: "Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Next in thread: Jeff Relf: "You are in violation of RFC 1036."
- Reply: Jeff Relf: "You are in violation of RFC 1036."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:04:02 -0800
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:41:36 +0200, jesse@phiwumbda.org (Jesse F.
Hughes) wrote:
[snip]
>How is Relf changing the subject line? (He didn't change this one.)
>Is it syntactic mangling or is it editorial choice? His posts don't
>usually appear in my newsreader, so I'm not sure exactly what the
>complaint is.
Editorial choice.
His replies to another person, as often as not, will appear with a new
subject header. No reason, just 'cuz - regardless if it annoys others
or not.
- Next message: Spaceman: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: Eddie: "Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Next in thread: Jeff Relf: "You are in violation of RFC 1036."
- Reply: Jeff Relf: "You are in violation of RFC 1036."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]