Re: Gravity is a Continuum
From: Eric Gisse (fseggNOSPAM_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: ZZBunker: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: Rick Cvejic: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Gravity is a Continuum"
- Next in thread: ZZBunker: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Reply: ZZBunker: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Reply: Mitchell: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:31:33 -0800
On 29 Jul 2004 17:37:16 -0700, macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell)
wrote:
>Gravity is not a particle. Gravitons do not exists; only
>a curved space-time continuum.
>Mitch Raemsch
> -- Light Falls in Gravity's Continuum --
Idiot.
Middleschool babble - like you, it means nothing to anyone except
yourself.
CRACK A FUCKING BOOK FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE
"Gravitation" : Misner, Thorne, Wheeler
"Introducing Einstein's Relatvitiy" : Ray D'Inverno
I, personally, am sick of your mindless spewing about a subect that
you know nothing about.
- Next message: ZZBunker: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: Rick Cvejic: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Gravity is a Continuum"
- Next in thread: ZZBunker: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Reply: ZZBunker: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Reply: Mitchell: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]