Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy.
From: ZZBunker (zzbunker_at_netscape.net)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: JonTi: "Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy."
- Previous message: Mike Helland: "Re: About the evidence and relativity"
- In reply to: Patrick Reany: "Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy."
- Next in thread: Franco: "Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Jul 2004 00:00:49 -0700
reany@asu.edu (Patrick Reany) wrote in message news:<844a1b64.0407291649.3557d143@posting.google.com>...
> "Franco" <englishenglish@tin.it> wrote in message news:<ak6Oc.70472$5D1.3402721@news4.tin.it>...
> > The thread "Science and philosophy" I posted July 9th, is very interesting
> > for most of users of these ng. They have been talking about science,
> > philosophy and religion for twenty days.
> >
> > As I said philosophy is dead and religion is only a trouble for science.
> > But in spite of that, most of users like to talk about philosophy and
> > religion too.
>
> What do you mean by "philosophy is dead"?
What is generally meant is that philosophy
died before Hegel was born.
And that Karl Marx tried to resucitate
something that only a total wank
like Dr. Goebbels would resucitate
anyway. So it really means that Philosophy
didn't really die, it's just something
only Psychologists on puppy-upper
acid trips do anyway, so it's optional.
- Next message: JonTi: "Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy."
- Previous message: Mike Helland: "Re: About the evidence and relativity"
- In reply to: Patrick Reany: "Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy."
- Next in thread: Franco: "Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|