Re: Gravity is a Continuum

From: Eric Gisse (fseggNOSPAM_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 07/30/04 

Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 05:16:38 -0800

On 29 Jul 2004 23:32:29 -0700, zzbunker@netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:

>Eric Gisse <fseggNOSPAM@uaf.edu> wrote in message news:<9ecjg0tcjg6os16j99r2tg6iv1bccao40q@4ax.com>...
>> On 29 Jul 2004 17:37:16 -0700, macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Gravity is not a particle. Gravitons do not exists; only
>> >a curved space-time continuum.
>> >Mitch Raemsch
>> > -- Light Falls in Gravity's Continuum --
>>
>> Idiot.
>>
>> Middleschool babble - like you, it means nothing to anyone except
>> yourself.
>>
>> CRACK A FUCKING BOOK FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE
>>
>> "Gravitation" : Misner, Thorne, Wheeler
>> "Introducing Einstein's Relatvitiy" : Ray D'Inverno
>>
>> I, personally, am sick of your mindless spewing about a subect that
>> you know nothing about.
>
> Many people have read it. And are still curious
> where this philosophy about Hydrogen ignorami
> keep coming up with this non-sense about
> Einstonium, and "Einstein's" relivity.
> Since the boob is known to have been the
> most probability challenged mathemeta-wanker
> to have hit Earth, since the more moronic
> Chemist Fig Newton hit Earth.
>
>
> Gravity is like a particle only in the way
> Jesus was a like particle. Hair today,
> hair tomorrow, but gone quicker than
> a Jesuit can sign up for an El Dorado
> Bumber-to-Bumber Cruise Control
> Insurance Policy.

Are you high?