Re: _ SHOULD _ Have No Back Reference.

From: Jesse F. Hughes (jesse_at_phiwumbda.org)
Date: 07/30/04 

Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:13:52 +0200

jmfbahciv@aol.com writes:

> In article <410a34eb$0$2826$61fed72c@news.rcn.com>,
> jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:
>>In article <87smb9zrz2.fsf@phiwumbda.org>,
>> jesse@phiwumbda.org (Jesse F. Hughes) wrote:
>>>Funny defense.
>>>
>>>RFC says you shouldn't do this.
>>>RFC doesn't say you mustn't do this.
>>>Conclusion: it's perfectly okay to do this.
>>>
>>>This is the reasoning of an ***.
>>
>>No, no. Fucking ***.
>
> Ptui. I screwed up. It's fucking idiot.

Uh, it's obvious you have a subtler grasp of epithets than I have.

Still, I can't help but think "***" was better. "Idiot" sounds
like he's ignorant and thus less culpable. 

-- 
Jesse F. Hughes 
"Radicals are interesting because they were considered 'radical' by
the people who played with them who wrote a lot of math work that
modern mathematics depends on." --Another JSH history lesson