Re: Mileva Maric Einstein

From: Mike (eleatis_at_yahoo.gr)
Date: 07/30/04


Date: 30 Jul 2004 14:33:40 -0700

perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com (Perfectly Innocent) wrote in message news:<c45b45b3.0407211632.5e52e247@posting.google.com>...
> The PBS presentation of *Einstein's Wife* consists of a one-hour
> documentary film and companion Web site. These tandem features
> explore the historical facts of Mileva Maric's life, and examine her
> dual roles as Albert Einstein's domestic and scientific partner. Given
> these facts, each observer must then decide, on their own, whether or
> not Einstein robbed Maric of her due.
>
> Did Mileva collaborate with Albert on the scientific papers of 1905?
> Study the evidence and decide. Take an online poll:
> http://www.pbs.org/opb/einsteinswife
>
> The timing of *Einstein's Wife* is the result of several events at the
> end of the past millennium. The West's first hint of Maric's existence
> came with a 1983 German translation of a Yugoslavian biography. Then
> the Princeton Press published the first of Einstein's 40,000 archived
> papers. By the early 1990s, there was open speculation that Maric was
> Einstein's intellectual collaborator. The debate remains open, in part
> because it appears that Einstein's executrix systematically destroyed
> potential evidence.
>
> I saw this film recently on the program Nova. It's powerful.
>
> Eugene Shubert
> http://www.everythingimportant.org

This whole thing reminds of the ENIAC versus ABC computers story. The
developers of the first stole the idea from the second during a
meeting and awarded a patent for the first digital computer. Later on,
after a lengthy fights, John Atanasoff, the developer of ABC, was able
to prove he was the originator of the idea and the pattent was
revoked.

It seems there is more and more evidence emerging that Einstein was a
clever plagiarist. We are talking about multiple counts of plagiarism.
One problem is that his victims are not around to fight in court.

To those who dispute these emerging evidence: we are not disputing the
value of relativity here. We are trying to determine its true
originator from the remains of distroyed evidence. I am certain truth
will shine and relativity will claim back its owners. Obviously, those
true owners were some people with a good understanding a mathematics
and not a person who barely new to solve a quadratic equation.

Mike



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mileva Maric Einstein
    ... > explore the historical facts of Mileva Maric's life, ... > Did Mileva collaborate with Albert on the scientific papers of 1905? ... > Study the evidence and decide. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: It bugs Fox.
    ... > modern and postmodern art. ... These suspicions are fully justified by the ... > overwhelming body of evidence and historical facts. ... And yet there is no evidence. ...
    (rec.arts.fine)
  • Re: Who is Jesus?
    ... I'd be interested to see the "Historical facts and archaeological ... I'm not sure that archaeology can possibly tell us ... All the ancient literary evidence -- the ... **Except that the Bible is a politically censored document. ...
    (rec.audio.tech)
  • Re: The latest on Albert Lucas...
    ... Peter Bone doesn't count now? ... Albert has video of 13. ... 14 is the record without evidence. ...
    (rec.juggling)
  • Re: Op-Ed: Students should be taught alternatives to evolution
    ... I wonder if evidence would seem more ... why insult historians for using textual ... needs to be treated with caution as a source of historical facts. ...
    (talk.origins)