Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror

From: hanson (hanson_at_quick.net)
Date: 07/30/04


Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:15:08 GMT


"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0407300945.70a5a3cb@posting.google.com...
> "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:<KclOc.2898$9Y6.1593@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> > "mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:64dddc3d.0407290754.41d5e2e@posting.google.com...
> > > "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
> > news:<2iPNc.1124$9Y6.533@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> > > > If the instigators had no willing audience to execute their
> > > > instigations then the instigators would stop instigating,
> > > > wouldn't they.
> >
> > [mitch perkins]
> > > <snip follow-upper worship[ped by Mitch,>..........
> >
> > ......Mitch, is an apprentice instigator who has developed a fetish
> > about having found his guru, idol and icon in Tom Potter, & who
> > asks in his flair of depressing insecurity and low self-esteem:
> >
> > [mitch perkins]
> > > You might want to answer this question yourself with a little...um,
> > > reading on the subject. Or not.
> > > BTW, what is the difference between Tom's 'good point' and your
> > > hahahaha?
> > > Mitch
> > >
> > [hanson]
> > You might want to answer this question yourself
> > to finally also make a "good point". Or not.
> > ahahahaha........ahahahanson
>
> Well that was reasonably entertaining.
> I think, my good man hanson, that it is not un-heard of for people
> to join the military because they have few alternatives,
> economically. Whether the situation is their own fault or not would be
> decided on an individual basis, I guess. In many cases I bet not.
> However, you um...make a good point that I'm not doing anything about
> it so pffft!
> Someone graciously provided a link here to Feynman's lectures
> online. Really looking forward to checking that out!
> Mitch
>
Mitch, what gives you the idea that anybody besides you here is talking
about the military; much less joining it, or not, and for whatever reasons.
So, Mitch, you are right however in that you just have demonstrated that
YOU do need lectures..... and much more basic ones than Feynman's......
ahahahaha.......ahahahahanson



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror
    ... >> Well that was reasonably entertaining. ... >> Someone graciously provided a link here to Feynman's lectures ... > Mitch, what gives you the idea that anybody besides you here is talking ... much less joining it, or not, and for whatever reasons. ...
    (sci.chem)
  • Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror
    ... >> Well that was reasonably entertaining. ... >> Someone graciously provided a link here to Feynman's lectures ... > Mitch, what gives you the idea that anybody besides you here is talking ... much less joining it, or not, and for whatever reasons. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror
    ... "mitch perkins" wrote in message ... > Well that was reasonably entertaining. ... > it so pffft! ...
    (sci.chem)
  • Re: Layman Logic Question
    ... Mitch Perkins wrote: ... >> weak and strong interactions, even though the latter is potentially ... Was it the last question that prompted you to leave me a-hangin'? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror
    ... "mitch perkins" wrote in message ... >> Mitch, what gives you the idea that anybody besides you here is talking ... Congratulations to you and your Wunder-baby. ... Continue to be such a good daddy. ...
    (sci.physics)