Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %
From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/31/04
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- Previous message: Snoopy: "Re: 'Multiverse Theory' - Universe is a Virtual Reality Matrix"
- In reply to: Goran Dhemmeog: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- Next in thread: Goran Dhemmeog: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 20:51:27 GMT
-- ============================================ SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com ============================================ "Goran Dhemmeog" <hcraeser731@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:b9eccd47.0407302124.63f1ed61@posting.google.com... > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<o9vOc.181202$a24.172690@attbi_s03>... > > "Henry" <se16@btinternet.com> wrote in message > > news:5f2jg0tkl8bkpvukrde6ck7lngmrtapo4r@4ax.com... > > > Or perhaps he isn't saying that, but he is quoting Unwin who is. > > > > [Hammond] > > yes that is what I am saying and > > that is what Unwin is saying, and there > > is no issue except Goran's obtuse idiocy. > > That was not what you were saying. It is what you should have said. I > asked you 3 times to provide an explanation of the formula. 2 times I > was ignored, the third time you provided me with only a repeat of the > formula. I admit that I have strong filters and don't really read your > messages; I assume that what you write is a fabrication unless proven > otherwise, which mostly never happens. [Hammond] I don't have to explain the formula! Its already EXPLAINED in a celebrated new book which iss reviewed in the july issue of SCIAM. Do your own fcukin homework. > > There appears to be now two possible answer to a critique on a > subject: > a) Explaining the derivation of the formula (as Henri did). > b) Repetion of the claim, and a quote to the effect: "you are full of > ***!". > Mr. Hammond invariably chooses the alternative b). [Hammond] Hammond is obviously the authority here... I think we should accept Hammond's answer. ==================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com ====================================
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- Previous message: Snoopy: "Re: 'Multiverse Theory' - Universe is a Virtual Reality Matrix"
- In reply to: Goran Dhemmeog: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- Next in thread: Goran Dhemmeog: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]