Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
From: David Thomson (_at_)
Date: 08/01/04
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: "The map is not the Territory"..."
- Previous message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: Questions that plague physics: Conversation with Lawrence M Krauss"
- In reply to: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Next in thread: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:01:05 -0500
"FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2n0oscFrvmihU1@uni-berlin.de...
> "greywolf42" <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote in message
> news:10gl12l6uril437@corp.supernews.com...
> | Well, true, but irrelevant. For the standard model is not itself
complete.
> | There is no such thing as a 'complete' theory in the scientific method.
>
> Yeah, "complete" is not the correct word to use here. Maybe "not even
> wrong" is better. ;-) Well, the big item here is being able to predict
> experimental evidence or explain it so that it makes some kind of sense.
I
> really do think that any particle theory should really be able to predict
> and explain particle decays and scattering events. David doesn't seem to
be
> able to do much of that yet. Thing is, I don't even think he has tried to
> do it with his model. If he would read about how it works in the SM, he
> might get a clue on how to do decay lifetimes, etc. for his model.
Fredi, with my theory I predict the exact decay of the neutron and precisely
quantify the neutrino. The Standard Model doesn't precisely quantify the
neutrino or its mechanics. My model can't predict when a given neutron will
decay, and neither can the Standard Model. The Standard Model uses
mathematics to predict a mean decay, which has nothing to do with physics
and everything to do with statistics.
As for scattering, the Compton scattering equations are perfectly compatible
with my theory. In fact, I use the Compton scattering as evidence to prove
my theory. The Compton function of 1-cos(theta) exactly describes the shape
of the electron that my model predicts.
In the Standard Model the photon is thought of as a point particle bouncing
off the electron, which is also taken as a point particle. If the electron
were a point, or sphere, it wouldn't have the scattering angles of
1-cos(theta). This is presented clearly in my theory.
BTW, I don't disagree that there may be an equation that will predict the
half life of a particular isotope or neutron. I plan to work on that
equation some day, too.
Dave
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: "The map is not the Territory"..."
- Previous message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: Questions that plague physics: Conversation with Lawrence M Krauss"
- In reply to: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Next in thread: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|