Re: Mileva Maric Einstein

From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 08/02/04 

Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 01:08:00 GMT

Tom Potter wrote:
>
> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
> news:410BDDB6.B41B336@mchsi.com...
> > Tom Potter wrote:
> > >
> > > "Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message
> > > news:9c1b39be.0407301333.75c6ec6c@posting.google.com...
> > > > perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com (Perfectly Innocent) wrote in message
> > > news:<c45b45b3.0407211632.5e52e247@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > The PBS presentation of *Einstein's Wife* consists of a one-hour
> > > > > documentary film and companion Web site. These tandem features
> > > > > explore the historical facts of Mileva Maric's life, and examine her
> > > > > dual roles as Albert Einstein's domestic and scientific partner.
> Given
> > > > > these facts, each observer must then decide, on their own, whether
> or
> > > > > not Einstein robbed Maric of her due.
> > > > >
> > > > > Did Mileva collaborate with Albert on the scientific papers of 1905?
> > > > > Study the evidence and decide. Take an online poll:
> > > > > http://www.pbs.org/opb/einsteinswife
> > > > >
> > > > > The timing of *Einstein's Wife* is the result of several events at
> the
> > > > > end of the past millennium. The West's first hint of Maric's
> existence
> > > > > came with a 1983 German translation of a Yugoslavian biography. Then
> > > > > the Princeton Press published the first of Einstein's 40,000
> archived
> > > > > papers. By the early 1990s, there was open speculation that Maric
> was
> > > > > Einstein's intellectual collaborator. The debate remains open, in
> part
> > > > > because it appears that Einstein's executrix systematically
> destroyed
> > > > > potential evidence.
> > > > >
> > > > > I saw this film recently on the program Nova. It's powerful.
> > > > >
> > > > > Eugene Shubert
> > > > > http://www.everythingimportant.org
> > > >
> > > > This whole thing reminds of the ENIAC versus ABC computers story. The
> > > > developers of the first stole the idea from the second during a
> > > > meeting and awarded a patent for the first digital computer. Later on,
> > > > after a lengthy fights, John Atanasoff, the developer of ABC, was able
> > > > to prove he was the originator of the idea and the pattent was
> > > > revoked.
> > > >
> > > > It seems there is more and more evidence emerging that Einstein was a
> > > > clever plagiarist. We are talking about multiple counts of plagiarism.
> > > > One problem is that his victims are not around to fight in court.
> > > >
> > > > To those who dispute these emerging evidence: we are not disputing the
> > > > value of relativity here. We are trying to determine its true
> > > > originator from the remains of distroyed evidence. I am certain truth
> > > > will shine and relativity will claim back its owners. Obviously, those
> > > > true owners were some people with a good understanding a mathematics
> > > > and not a person who barely new to solve a quadratic equation.
> > >
> > > It is interesting to observe that General Relativity
> > > was basically applying the tools of stress analysis ( Tensors, etc. )
> > > which were coming into general use during the late 1900's,
> > > to look at a stressed body from the inside,
> > > rather than from the outside,
> > > and there is basically no difference in the views.
> > >
> > > All the hard work was on developing the tools
> > > to do stress analysis, and Einstein,
> > > just put the observer inside the stressed object,
> > > rather than on the outside.
> > >
> > > Too bad, no one ever hears about
> > > the guys who did all the hard work.
> > >
> > > It is interesting to see that Sam Wormley,
> > > who is basically a grunt, stress and strain guy,
> > > has sold out to Einstein and General relativity,
> > > rather than giving the deserved credit to the
> > > creative pioneers in the stress analysis field.
> > >
> > > It is interesting to see how propaganda and hype,
> > > obscure facts even in people who should have
> > > access to the details.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
> >
> > Crank Information
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=einstein+hoax+site%3Awww.crank.net
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Potter
>
> It is interesting to see that "Sam Wormley"
> continues to use his boilerplate reference
> of the Web Site of a computer programmer,
> who took some data processing classes
> at a third rate California college,

  What college is that Potter?

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mileva Maric Einstein
    ... Tom Potter wrote: ... >> Crank Information ... > at a third rate California college, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Physics Cultists
    ... >> The one that John Baez works at is a second rate California college. ... > of your credibility problem, ... Sorry I confused you Wormley. ... Tom Potter ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Syncronized atomic clocks
    ... Spamming the newsgroups with your standard, ... featuring the Professor at a second rate California college, ... Tom Potter ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The Cost of Relativity
    ... >> and repost it to illustrate this. ... > Crank Information ... Sam Wormley does what most losers do, ... Tom Potter ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The Cost of Relativity
    ... >> and repost it to illustrate this. ... > Crank Information ... Sam Wormley does what most losers do, ... Tom Potter ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)