Re: The ultimate luxury ?
From: Jim Richardson (warlock_at_eskimo.com)
Date: 08/03/04
- Next message: Hamilcar Barca: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Previous message: MorituriMax: "Re: Emergence of Physical Laws"
- Maybe in reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Next in thread: Hamilcar Barca: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 17:30:10 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 03 Aug 04 12:11:13 GMT,
jmfbahciv@aol.com <jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote:
> In article <oPLPc.7757$Jp6.937@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> Bo Grimes <vcg3rd@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> You keep removing sci.physics. In order to answer your question,
> I have to keep adding it back in case you post again. I'm
> not going to wipe your snot again. If you want me to answer
> a question, you have to include the newsgroup I'm reading.
>
Huh ? Bo's post was crossposted to sci.physics as well as cola, what are
you talking about?
Bo didn't remove sci.physics from his post, it would seem, that you
simply didn't want to answer his points.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBD8oid90bcYOAWPYRAk8yAKDVgAXLpsfIlokBV3io/3sq+8oQ9ACg4JKC
OY/XGAA1dp8T9WKMZdu2yS4=
=tnCf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock "Neutiquam erro et nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione."
- Next message: Hamilcar Barca: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Previous message: MorituriMax: "Re: Emergence of Physical Laws"
- Maybe in reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Next in thread: Hamilcar Barca: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|