Re: The ultimate luxury ?
From: mitch perkins (mitchsperkins_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/03/04
- Next message: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Previous message: tadchem: "Re: Emergence of Physical Laws"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Aug 2004 14:30:00 -0700
jesse@phiwumbda.org (Jesse F. Hughes) wrote in message news:<87vfg0iayv.fsf@phiwumbda.org>...
>
> Especially, these distinctions which are so stunningly important to
> you have nothing to do with the fact that Relf's subject changes do
> not trouble those of us who sort/collate/flib-flub on references
> rather than subject.
Relf's subject changes have become his subject matter. Ours too.
Crappy!
Question: would it trouble those of you who sort/collate/flib-flub
on references rather than subject if Relf *didn't* change the subject
line? Because that is the simple to pointy hatted, gum-bleedingly,
live-television-broadcast-about-my-knees type of straight-forward
request that folks have repeatedly made of him.
Silver lining: It does take one's mind off of all those exceedingly
annoying 'open questions in physics'.
<http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/open_questions.html>
Mitch
- Next message: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Previous message: tadchem: "Re: Emergence of Physical Laws"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|