Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder
From: Tupac Chopra (master_at_mason.snuh)
Date: 08/04/04
- Next message: Jim: "Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames"
- Previous message: David Canzi -- non-mailable address: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- In reply to: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Next in thread: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Reply: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Reply: lensman1955: "Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Aug 2004 03:41:19 GMT
"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:igYPc.65$mK3.48@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com:
>
> "Tupac Chopra" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> news:Xns953A7EFBCD4B9spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
>> "Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:NbOPc.938
>> $Uk2.742@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com:
>>
>> >
>> > "Tupac Chopra" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns953A2A03DAACCspamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
>> >>
>> >> Ralph. People have eyes. I have pictures.
>> >>
>> >> No 120-Foot Hole In The Pentagon
>> >> http://www.questionsquestions.net/docs04/bugle/images2/bugle4.jpg
>> >>
>> > Of the many Pic's available re "The Entry Hole you have chosen this
>> > one because it probably best disguises the entry hole due smoke.
>> > Review your collection to see if there are not others that show the
>> > entry hole more clearely once the smoke has cleared.
>>
>>
>> There is no smoke on the right side, which clearly shows, at best, a
> series
>> of holes. There was no 120-foot hole.
>>
> The series of holes on the "Right Side" of the pic youreference are
> windows. The entry hole is ~ directly in front of & to the left of the
> ARFF/CFR vehicle, where some fire is visible, predominately obscured
> by smoke. Can you definitively say, from the view of the pic in
> question there is no hole in the position I describe.
They are not windows. They are columns.
Do you even know what you're talking about?
I can definitively say there is no 120-foot wide hole.
Can you show me one?
>>
>> Maybe you can find a pic of a 120-foot wide hole? I bet you can't...
>>
> Will not waste time scouring the net. The hole is delineated in the
> bldg performace report.
My photos trump your nonsense, Ralph.
>>
>> Because it didn't exist.
>>
> Whether a Pic of the hole with appropriate dimension reference exixts
> is irrevelant. The hole is documented/detailed in the Bldg performance
> report.
I just cited scads of information from the ASCE report that disproves
your claims.
No 757 Hit The Pentagon
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
-- BeDoper - http://www.bedoper.com/ Meter Versus Yard - http://www.soundclick.com/bands/3/meterversusyard.htm DJ Manticore - http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/manticore.htm http://www.soundclick.com/bands/9/monteau.htm High-C - http://www.garageband.com/artist/jasongortician http://www.soundclick.com/theoriginalhighc
- Next message: Jim: "Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames"
- Previous message: David Canzi -- non-mailable address: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- In reply to: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Next in thread: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Reply: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Reply: lensman1955: "Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|