Re: The ultimate luxury ?

From: Jesse F. Hughes (jesse_at_phiwumbda.org)
Date: 08/04/04 

Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 09:46:10 +0200

mitchsperkins@yahoo.com (mitch perkins) writes:

> jesse@phiwumbda.org (Jesse F. Hughes) wrote in message news:<87vfg0iayv.fsf@phiwumbda.org>...
>>
>> Especially, these distinctions which are so stunningly important to
>> you have nothing to do with the fact that Relf's subject changes do
>> not trouble those of us who sort/collate/flib-flub on references
>> rather than subject.
>
> Relf's subject changes have become his subject matter. Ours too.
> Crappy!
>
> Question: would it trouble those of you who sort/collate/flib-flub
> on references rather than subject if Relf *didn't* change the subject
> line? Because that is the simple to pointy hatted, gum-bleedingly,
> live-television-broadcast-about-my-knees type of straight-forward
> request that folks have repeatedly made of him.

I have never defended Relf's refusal to listen to sensible requests or
said that changing the subject line repeatedly is nice. 

-- 
Jesse Hughes
"LOL.  How arrogant you are.  Now when you realize that I DID prove
Goldbach's conjecture and that I proved Fermat's Last Theorem as well,
how are you going to feel then?" -- James Harris
Quantcast