Re: The Emptiness of Theology
From: Albert (alwagner_at_tcac.net)
Date: 08/04/04
- Next message: Dlihcsw: "Re: Anyone have an opinion of this GR book?"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: How to make measurements of a particle"
- In reply to: David Canzi -- non-mailable address: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- Next in thread: David Canzi -- non-mailable address: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- Reply: David Canzi -- non-mailable address: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:15:43 -0500
dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi -- non-mailable
address) wrote:
<snip>
> Nobody dies from not knowing the answers to these "most
> important questions". They can't be all that important.
Spoken like a true materialist. There is no answer that could
convince you. Some minds are stillborn regarding such questions.
> If some fact can't be known by observation, how do you propose
> to discover it?
I know many facts about myself by subjective observation, among
those facts are subjective certainty regarding the source of
those facts. Sorry, but subjective facts are defined as
'opinion' by the scientific method, which is limited to only
objective observations. BTW, your mental handicap is formally
labeled by psychology as 'sociopathic.'
--
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express
it."
-- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"
- Next message: Dlihcsw: "Re: Anyone have an opinion of this GR book?"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: How to make measurements of a particle"
- In reply to: David Canzi -- non-mailable address: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- Next in thread: David Canzi -- non-mailable address: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- Reply: David Canzi -- non-mailable address: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
