Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder

From: Tupac Chopra (master_at_mason.snuh)
Date: 08/05/04 

Date: 5 Aug 2004 02:17:22 GMT

"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:DWXPc.60$UC3.43@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com:

>
> "Tupac Chopra" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> news:Xns953A7E70218C2spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
>> "Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
>> news:7_NPc.935$Lh2.711@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com:
>>
>> >
>> > "Tupac Chopra" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns953A29CA96F72spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
>> >> "Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
>> >> news:XSCPc.1750$bu4.144@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com:
>> >>
>> > <Snip>
>> >>
>> > Perhaps you should work for FEMA, then. Their findings were very
>> >> inconclusive.
>> >>
>> > Your continual rants against the FEMA & ASCE Report/s useing
>> > studies prepared by technical specialists/organizations in given
>> > fields are "Ludricous" at best. If you have a "Technical
>> > Disagreement" with their work fine, post your differences & why
>> > with specific "Technical Supporting Details". Please provide your
>> > technical qualifications or the technical qualifications of those
>> > you cite with appropriate proviance.
>>
>>
>> First of all, Ralph, you write, type and spell like an alcoholic.
>> Just an aside.
>>
> A typical dodge by you when faced with questions re lagitimacy of your
> responses

A simple fact. My 9 year old writes better than you do. Of course, she
doesn't drink.

>>
>> Now then. FEMA's report on WTC-7 was inconclusive. You might want to
>> read it. The ASCE report was a building performance report, and had
>> essentially nothing to do with whether or not a 757 hit the Pentagon.
>> It assumed a 757 had, and went from there.
>>
> Agreed the ASCE report is a "Building Performance Report" that details
> how the bldg withstood the impact of the AA 757.

Yet you constantly cite it as proof that a 757 hit the Pentagon.

> It is a known fact a AA 757 crashed into the Pentagon which you refuse
> to accept.

If it was a "known fact", there wouldn't be 5000 websites questioning it.

You would be able to debunk my site. But you can't.

> Don't respond with your usual "Blabber" of "prove it".
> Definitively prove an AA 757 dit not crash into the Pentagon, don't
> respond with your usual "wild crack head speculation".

Good job on "wild crack head speculation", Ralphie. You're very credible.

>> And furthermore, the ASCE report contains at least one huge lie,
>> which is easily proven.
>>
> Basis. Provide Details & specifics.

I did. You keep snipping and avoiding it.

The ASCE report claims that the white smoke trail is a 757. Do you agree
with their "findings"?

>>
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > <Snip>
>> >>
>> >> Why does Lensman drop the threads so often, and why do both keep
>> >> snipping that URL?
>> >>
>> > Lensman can speak for himself.
>>
>>
>> Except for when he drops threads.
>>
>>
>> > Personally the information/exhibts at the URL are lacking in
>> > validity. Most are "Smoke & Mirrors Assumptions" without basis in
>> > fact, while the rest is "Biased Speculation" designed to be
>> > insulting to those with a technical knowledge of some of the
>> > subjects IMHO.
>>
>>
>> Can you point out the ones without basis in fact, or lacking in
>> validity?
>>
> All begining with your biased assumptions.

Like the ASCE's biased assumptions?

>>
> <snip>
>>
>> And what parts are "designed to be insulting"?
>>
> All

Can you give me an example?

>>
>> You've never seen the site, have you, Ralph?
>>
> Yes

Which one?

>>
>>
>>
>> > As for dropping threads. Your classic "Bait & Switch"
>> > response/posting tactics in an attempt to create confunsion re the
>> > subject, then responding with a "Gotcha" based on
>> > selective/creative sniping is not appreciated.
>>
>> Could you please clarify this for me?
>>
> My comment above speaks for itself.

Incoherent nonsense, indicative of alcoholism.

>>
>> > Combine the above with your continous changing of monikers/posting
>> > names makes it troublesome to identify you as a specific poster. If
>> > not comfortable useing your ral name, choose a posting
>> > name/handle/moniker & use it continously, that is if your
>> > intentions are legitimate, above board, on the "Up & Up.
>>
>>
>> I'll drink to that, Ralphie!
>>
>>
>> --
>> BeDoper -
> Ralph Nesbitt
> Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
> Posting from ADA

Suddenly your ISP supports a lot more than 2 groups, Ralphie...

No 757 Hit The Pentagon
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman 

-- 
BeDoper - http://www.bedoper.com/
Meter Versus Yard - http://www.soundclick.com/bands/3/meterversusyard.htm
DJ Manticore - http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/manticore.htm
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/9/monteau.htm
High-C - http://www.garageband.com/artist/jasongortician
http://www.soundclick.com/theoriginalhighc

Relevant Pages