Re: The ultimate luxury ?
From: Johan Lindquist (spam_at_smilfinken.net)
Date: 08/05/04
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Previous message: asps: "Foedus et religio tenemur"
- Maybe in reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:56:28 +0200
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.advocacy.]
So anyway, it was like, 11:51 CEST Aug 05 2004, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
jmfbahciv@aol.com was all like, "Dude,
> In article <a8b7u1-ici.ln1@grendel.myth>,
> Jim Richardson <warlock@eskimo.com> wrote:
>>Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics
>>Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
>
> Sigh! Now look at this. It does not contain s.p. Thus, any followup
> to this post will only be posted to c.o.l.a.
For someone who nitpicks and debates in absurdum someone else's use of
the term "sort", you sure have a relaxed way of using the phrase "does
not contain".
>From reading parts of what has been leaking over from your regular
playground, I get the impression that the only thing you're after is
an argument. Of course, I could be wrong, and you just can't deal with
not finding yourself being absolutely correct all of the time.
We get both kinds around here too.
-- Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> * 13:47:30 up 22 days, 16:20, 9 users, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00 Linux 2.6.7 x86_64 GNU/Linux Registered Linux user #261729
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Previous message: asps: "Foedus et religio tenemur"
- Maybe in reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|