Re: The ultimate luxury ?
From: Jim Richardson (warlock_at_eskimo.com)
Date: 08/05/04
- Next message: Pyriform: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- Previous message: Synchrodestiny's Child: "The ASCE Report Proven To Be Garbage"
- Maybe in reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:00:13 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 05 Aug 04 09:51:46 GMT,
jmfbahciv@aol.com <jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote:
> In article <a8b7u1-ici.ln1@grendel.myth>,
> Jim Richardson <warlock@eskimo.com> wrote:
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>On Wed, 04 Aug 04 10:16:46 GMT,
>> jmfbahciv@aol.com <jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote:
>>> In article <2au4u1-lq5.ln1@grendel.myth>,
>>> Jim Richardson <warlock@eskimo.com> wrote:
>>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>>On Tue, 03 Aug 04 12:11:13 GMT,
>>>> jmfbahciv@aol.com <jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <oPLPc.7757$Jp6.937@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
>>>>> Bo Grimes <vcg3rd@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You keep removing sci.physics. In order to answer your question,
>>>>> I have to keep adding it back in case you post again. I'm
>>>>> not going to wipe your snot again. If you want me to answer
>>>>> a question, you have to include the newsgroup I'm reading.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Huh ? Bo's post was crossposted to sci.physics
>>>
>>> Nope. Not on my newsserver.
>>>
>>
>>Then your newserver's børked.
>
> Nope. My newsserver worked according to the spec.
>
>> ..The headers of Bo's post, the one you
>>claimed wasn't crossposted to sci.physics.
>>
>>- --begin--
>>
>>Path:
> attbi_s04!attbi_s03!attbi_s01!attbi_s02!attbi_slave12!attbi_master11!wns13
>>Message-ID: <oPLPc.7757$Jp6.937@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>
>>From: Bo Grimes <vcg3rd@earthlink.net>
>>Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics
^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>Subject: Re: The ultimate luxury ?
>>Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 12:47:16 GMT
>>References: <87hdrp2xs3.fsf@phiwumbda.org>
>><410bb162$0$2815$61fed72c@news.rcn.coLines: 35
>>Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
>
> Sigh! Now look at this. It does not contain s.p. Thus, any
> followup to this post will only be posted to c.o.l.a.
>
Again your story changes. You claimed that Bo had removed sci.physics
from the newsgroups list. He did not. He *added* a Followup-To: which is
a whole different matter. Bo admitted that he added same, and that he
*should* have noted so in the post. However, adding a followup-to will
have no effect on the receiving newsgroups of the post with the
followup-to. The post will be posted to any and all groups in the
newsgroups line. Your *newsreader* will post to the followup-to group,
if it is so configured.
Your claim was bogus, and now you waffle, trying to obscure that
bogosity. Bo did not remove sci.physics from the newsgroups header. You
could read Bo's post in sci.physics.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBEmXhd90bcYOAWPYRAhVSAJ93TnkrPJopBos+qjCg+34MOlBGiQCgkf8O
n5GCqL5hTZ8qH6LOxQR8Gfo=
=XDkW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock Do I LOOK like a damn people person?
- Next message: Pyriform: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- Previous message: Synchrodestiny's Child: "The ASCE Report Proven To Be Garbage"
- Maybe in reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: The ultimate luxury ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
