Re: process physics (was Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits)

From: Laurent (cyberdyno2_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/05/04 

Date: 5 Aug 2004 12:16:24 -0700

"mountain man" <hobbit@southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote in message news:<3wmQc.34183$K53.28889@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> "Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
> news:slrncgqn48.lc.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
> > mountain man:
> > >"Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
>
> > >> Only if by ``relativistic effects'' you mean the most trivial
> > >> phenomeology associated with a lorentz boost. Even then, there's
> > >> no physical effect which could depend on that absolute motion,
> > >> so any existence it has addresses philosophical satisfaction,
> > >> not physics.
>
> > >All physical, gravitational and electromagnetic effects
> > >are reliant upon the aether.
> >
> > That is the assertion I am disputing, so asserting it again doesn't
> > provide any more proof that it did the first time.
>
>
> Einstein similarly postulated that
> the aether does not exist.
>
>
> Michelson & Morely, and Miller in the time of Einstein
> published experimental data conflicting with this hypothesis.
>
> Other more recent analyses show further experiments are
> revealing the signature of absolute motion:
> http://www.mountainman.com.au/process_physics/absolute_motion_register.htm
>
>
>
>
> Pete Brown
> Falls Creek
> Oz

But how could the aether exist if it ain't matter?

Relevant Pages
Quantcast