Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?
From: Mitchell (macromitch_at_internetCDS.com)
Date: 08/06/04
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: &&& ^^^ !!! * Princess Little Honey's Faith Based Initiatives"
- Previous message: Synchrodestiny's Child: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 6 Aug 2004 10:46:22 -0700
Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cevfkk$i32$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> Mitchell wrote:
> > Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cesp8f$2mu$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> >
> >>Mitchell wrote:
> >>
> >>>Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<ceqc6p$fd9$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>dkomo wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>MorituriMax wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>dkomo wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I need a definitive answer to two questions:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>1. does the fact that space is flat imply that the universe is spatially
> >>>>>>>infinite?
> >>>
> >>>An original flat space of a naked singularity
> >>
> >>What on earth is that supposed to mean?
> >>
> >>
> >>>(Big Bang without gravity)
> >>
> >>And that? And what has it to do with what you said previously?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>would have boundaries.
> >>
> >>How does that follow?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>If you don't want it to have boundaries you must include
> >>>gravity in the very begining.
> >>
> >>And that?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>But if you do you get a "universe
> >>>black hole" where the infinite gravity of the entire universe would
> >>>prevent any expansion.
> >>
> >>And that?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Space could expand around it but would leave
> >>>the mass core behind intact.
> >>
> >>And that?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>By Unification it can be said that the universe had to begin with
> >>>gravity.
> >>
> >>Unification of what?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>But only a finite density of mass would stop gravity from being all
> >>>powerful causing imediate collapse.
> >>
> >>Why?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Mass was created spread out; not as a point(singularity).
> >>
> >>Hint: "singularity" does not necessarily mean "point".
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Bye,
> >>Bjoern
> >
> >
> > Bjoern I've always wanted to tell you you're slime.
> > You're just another subhuman that thinks he has what he doesn't.
> > And is proud.
>
> Instead of answering my questions, you choose to insult me. Interesting
> reaction.
>
> Join in with Y.Porat, kenseto, Georg Hammond, Androcles and some more.
> They also seem to think that insults are arguments, and answering
> questions is not necessary.
>
>
> Bye,
> Bjoern
Slimeball.
There not even questions.
You thought you could get away with that?
I don't think so.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Slows --
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: &&& ^^^ !!! * Princess Little Honey's Faith Based Initiatives"
- Previous message: Synchrodestiny's Child: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|