Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder

From: Synchrodestiny's Child (master_at_mason.snuh)
Date: 08/07/04 

Date: 7 Aug 2004 01:41:46 GMT

JJ <radiobuff66@mailcity.moc> wrote in
news:P4GdndsBxoYht4ncRVn-hw@gbronline.com:

> Synchrodestiny's Child AKA Tapioca Pudding wrote:
>> JJ <radiobuff66@mailcity.moc> wrote in
>> news:j_KdnXMWYs7Ac47cRVn-hA@gbronline.com:
>>
>>
>>>Synchrodestiny's Child wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Well, there you go. And you sort of almost found that out on your
>>>>own.
>>>
>>>A whole big whopping two eyewitnesses as opposed to the dozens of
>>>others who say exactly what happened, that AA flight 77 crashed into
>>>the Pentagon.
>>
>>
>>
>> No, that was two cited eyewitnesses. Which disproved your claim.
>>
>> So you instead switch tactics. How craven of you.
>
> So two witnesses who claim to have seen a small commuter jet instead
> of the large American Airlines airliner as cited by dozens of others
> are to believed and not the dozens who actually saw what happened. Oh,
> now I get it, those two witnesses support the silly claim of a
> conspircy so they must be believed and all the others are wrong.

I was right, and you were wrong. You don't seem to be taking this well at
all.

>
>
>>
>>>>Mr. Eastman is leagues ahead of any of you in the Pentagon research
>>>>department.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Eastmen is in a league allright, but it has nothing to do with honest
>>>research and truth.
>
> It has already been debunked sherlock,

Erm, when and where?

> you're just to stupid to see
> it. Now why don't you go out and get a real job and a life. Maybe you
> can work for Eastman making up claims of conspiricies. Your
> credibility is zero. Still waiting for those names with supporting
> references of those hijackers you claim are still alive.
 
Check with Google. And the BBC. And a ton of other news sources. Have you
been in a cave for three years or something? 

-- 
http://BeDoper.com - BeOS and a hell of a lot more
BeDoper Portal - http://www.bedoper.com/portal