Re: Question on water pressure on dam
From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 08/07/04
- Next message: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Previous message: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: Your Gubmint Investigations Exposed was Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- In reply to: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Question on water pressure on dam"
- Next in thread: Mitchell Jones: "Re: Question on water pressure on dam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 00:36:48 -0400
Slap a million bucks down here JIMP de pimp.
Nothing makes sence to Jimp de pimp.
350 cubic inches at 6000 rpm is 100 times the intake as 350 cubic
inches at 60 rpm.
EVEN befor you boost the gas into beeing rocket fuel by using o2. o2
makes it stronger.
The steam and te O2 soak up that heat and expand . The 1 second stroke
makes the perfect heat exchange in mol.
It drives a sliding vane rotor with 100 % effective force. that alone
beats your car 4 times ,,then its a 12 inch lever ..
1000 pounds at 12 inches R at 1450 rpm
100 cubic feet intake per hour.
(( same egine on amoniumnitrate and diesel is 4500 pounds at 12 inch up
to 1450 rpm rotor speed. ))
- Next message: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Previous message: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: Your Gubmint Investigations Exposed was Re: Sloppy Pentagon Investigation was Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- In reply to: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Question on water pressure on dam"
- Next in thread: Mitchell Jones: "Re: Question on water pressure on dam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
