Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder

From: Homeland_Insecurity (insecurity_at_homeland.net)
Date: 08/07/04 

Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 20:05:13 GMT

"running with scissors" <aabbcc_running_with_scissors@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:d0fe9d08.0408060450.2640a347@posting.google.com...
> "Synchrodestiny's Child" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
news:<Xns953C9A22C8FE6spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> > "Meat-->Plow" <Meat@petitmorte.net> wrote in
> > news:ojr4h05qbvhpqrbhmbrfghh55f6eeonrop@4ax.com:
> >
> > > On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:45:05 -0700, "AbsolutelyCertain"
> > > <easily@entertained.net>,wrote:
> > >
> > >>Synchrodestiny's Child" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> > >>news:Xns953C75EDBC326spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
> > >>> It's a building study. And it clearly disproves your "folding wing"
> > >>> theory.
> > >>
> > >>There is no "folding wing" theory. Whether someone described the wing
> > >>destruction that way or not, has no bearing on what actually happened.
> > >> One of your troll-prolongnation devices is to harangue until you can
> > >>find some clumsy speech on the part of an antagonist, and then pounce
> > >>on that as if that description were the crux of the argument. It's a
> > >>pretty predictable Jason Christie strawman technique.
> > >>
> > >>The "building study" is an engineering analysis of what happened to
> > >>this building when a Boeing 757 struck and entered it. It can be
> > >>pretty well established that nothing in the world *but* a Boeing 757
> > >>could have caused the result we saw on 9-11.
> > >>
> > >>If you can come up with some other mechanism for the damage signature
> > >>left behind and described in the ASCE report, let's see it.
> > >>
> > >>Get lost, Jason. You're walking on thin ice. You might want to check
> > >>under your car before you drive down to the liquor store today. You
> > >>have made yourself a few enemies:
> > >
> > > Jason is a sad little drug addict who can't prove he even exists in
> > > real life let alone the wild and farcical claims he makes on Usenet.
> > > He yearns to be part of rational discussion but lacks the people
> > > skills and mental power to participate with useful dialog.
> >
> > Finally a real expert weighs in...
> >
> > Did your retarded kid tell you all of that while you were growing pot?
> >
> > No 757 Hit The Pentagon
> > http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
> >
> >
> > See if you can debunk that page for me, Meaty. No fair asking your kid
> > for help!
>
>
> its been done already nimrod... over two years ago as i have stated
> to you and your stupid *** "hero" several times.
>
> obviously you are too dim to read an archive.

And you can't provide the link. It would be much simpler
to just have it handy instead of all that shrieking going on.

Quantcast