Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder

From: Synchrodestiny's Child (master_at_mason.snuh)
Date: 08/07/04 

Date: 7 Aug 2004 21:18:51 GMT

JJ <radiobuff99@mailcity.moc> wrote in
news:p4CdneFTYNG_3IjcRVn-jg@gbronline.com:

> running with scissors wrote:
>> "Synchrodestiny's Child" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
>> news:<Xns953D814A3752Fspamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
>>
>>>JJ <radiobuff66@mailcity.moc> wrote in news:bJmdnVTaNp1JLo7cRVn-
>>>iQ@gbronline.com:
>>>
>>
>> <Headers Snipped>
>>
>>>So you can debunk it?
>>>
>>>
>>>No 757 Hit The Pentagon
>>>http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ok half moron. as i have stated to your hero "Homeland_Insecurity"
>> eastman and his garbage have been debunked several times in the past
>> 2+ years. now, IF YOU CANNOT GRASP the simple fact that the
>> contributors have little inclination than to discuss your continual
>> reguritation of bedoper.com/eatsman and your claims of the insight
>> and knowledge of a part time shelf stacker at blockers in avaition
>> accident investigation, aviation, middle eastern geopolitics,
>> architecture, structural engineering, etc etc. your continual
>> requestes for debunking are null and void.
>>
>> now again you have a choice here, you can take time out to read the
>> archives or you can continue to represent yourself as a moron with
>> the memory of a goldfish and utter incapacity to absorb information,
>> and thus present yourself as a stupid ***. or you can carry on as
>> you ahve been.
>>
>> so go on then. what are you going to? read the archives and show
>> some tiny inkling of intellect or not? well we pretty much know what
>> you will do, we all do.
>>
>> so go on then prove me wrong you stupid ***.
>
> He can't prove you wrong, he can only parrot Eastman. Every eyewitness
> that saw the American Airlines passenger jet crash into the Pentagon
> debunks Eastman's rantings. Anyone with more than three working brain
> cells who reads Eastman's conspiracy theory will have a good laugh at
> such absurdities. They can point to the photos all they want, but many
> eyewitnesses who were close to the Pentagaon saw the AA jet crash into
> the building. Of course all those eyewitnesses just did not know what
> they were seeing and aren't credible, but those who say something that
> would support Eastman's crazy theories are absolutely credible and
> correct in their observations.
> Your wasting time arguing with this looney.
 
Aren't you the guy who doesn't even know almost half of the "hijackers"
are still alive?

 

Photographic evidence, which has more credence than conflicting
eyewitnesses, says no 757 hit the Pentagon.

No 757 Hit The Pentagon
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman

A case based solely on eyewitnesses versus photographic evidence would
fail miserably in any court in the land.

; ) 

-- 
http://BeDoper.com - BeOS and a hell of a lot more
BeDoper Portal - http://www.bedoper.com/portal