Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder
From: AbsolutelyCertain (easily_at_entertained.net)
Date: 08/08/04
- Next message: AbsolutelyCertain: "Re: Pentagon Struck by Giant Pachinko Ball was Re: More Pentagon Disinformation"
- Previous message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Question on water pressure on dam"
- In reply to: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Next in thread: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Reply: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 18:54:26 -0700
"Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
news:tFfRc.39087$zc4.13654717@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
>
> "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in message
> news:cf3ukn$3dc$0@pita.alt.net...
> >
> > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> > news:aQeRc.38845$zc4.13504690@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> > >
> > > "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in message
> > > news:cf3p13$mt0$0@pita.alt.net...
> > > >
> > > > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:WDdRc.38459$zc4.13291870@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> > > > >
> > > > > "JJ" <radiobuff99@mailcity.moc> wrote in message
> > > > > news:IKudnVBrCNw4xIjcRVn-pQ@gbronline.com...
> > > > > > Synchrodestiny's Child wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Aren't you the guy who doesn't even know almost half of the
> > > > "hijackers"
> > > > > > > are still alive?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Aren't you the idiot that can't provide any creditable evidence
> they
> > > > are?
> > > > >
> > > > > LOL. You want to make wager, beeyitch?
> > > >
> > > > You're going to wager that "half of the hijackers are still alive?"
> > > >
> > > > Who is going to hold your money?
> > >
> > > Why? You know that jj would owe me.
> > >
> > > Now I ask you again to provide the text that
> > > details how no colums in between the AC's path and that
> > > punch out hole were significantly damaged, broken, bent
> > > or missing as you claimed, yet it still made a huge 8ft
> > > diameter hole once it got through them.
> >
> > As opposed to a small 8 foot hole?
> >
> > Your question has already been answered.
>
> Yes, you say so. Problem is you only posted the ASCE link.
> You never supplied the text, eh.
"Supplied"? Did you think this was a cafeteria?
The url to the report has been posted about a hundred times now. Anyone who
needs it can get it, they don't need your help to get it, or your advice to
understand it.
- Next message: AbsolutelyCertain: "Re: Pentagon Struck by Giant Pachinko Ball was Re: More Pentagon Disinformation"
- Previous message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Question on water pressure on dam"
- In reply to: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Next in thread: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Reply: Homeland_Insecurity: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]