EXPOSED: Stalker Alan Schwartz aka Uncle Al <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>

From: Dr. Jai Maharaj (usenet_at_mantra.com)
Date: 08/10/04 

Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 06:42:34 GMT

EXPOSED: Stalker 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>

How to handle stalkers and
   'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>

[ Subject: How to handle stalkers and Uncle Al
[ From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutoniu@willinet.net>
[ Newsgroups: sci.chem,sci.physics,sci.archaeology
[ Message-ID: <3A6128B1.7ED158B6@willinet.net>
[ Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001
[
[
[ Ryan Doherty wrote:
[
[ > Uncle Al (24.16.181.181),
[ >
[ > I am consider this message of yours SPAM, so please
[ > keep your childish postings to yourself!
[ > By the way, Grow up.. you are wasting more bandwidth
[ > with your repeated responces that Archimedes and his
[ > questions!
[ >
[ > Ryan
[
[ > Ryan, you are talking to a fence post when you talk to
[ > Uncle Al. He and his motley crew of cohorts have stalked
[ > me for years. In fact they have stalked me nonstop for 7
[ > years now.
[ >
[ > Uncle Al feels he is a police cop of sci.chem and
[ > sci.physics and wants to chase out any poster he does not
[ > like. Many chemistry professors have put Al Schwartz into
[ > their killfile. That is about the only real solution.
[ >
[ > Some say Al Schwartz is a failed chemistry professor of
[ > 80s in age living in Tallahassee Florida or Denton Texas.
[ > He is old, cranky with nothing to do but post to the
[ > Internet. He feels a righteous duty to stalk me. No
[ > matter if I post pure chemistry to sci. chem or pure
[ > physics to sci.physics, Uncle Al feels that none of my
[ > posts belongs to those newsgroups.
[ >
[ > He has set himself up as a self righteous self imposed
[ > police cop of sci.chem.
[ >
[ > Many other people have complained about Uncle Al in sci.
[ > chem.
[ >
[ > SOLUTION: the only solution that I can see is to killfile
[ > Uncle Al and all Al supporters. And to add sci.chem and
[ > sci.physics to all of your posts to the Internet. Let
[ > Uncle Al stalk you everywhere, not just sci. chem or sci
[ > physics. Make it so that everyday Uncle Al wakes up, his
[ > chores and work are to stalk people on the Internet. Make
[ > it such that the essence of life for Uncle Al will now be
[ > to stalk 1 or 3 or 20 or 117 people every day.
[ >
[ > So, I am asking of all those people on the Internet who
[ > have been attacked by Uncle Al, to give Uncle Al what he
[ > craves. Add sci.chem and sci.physics to all of your
[ > Internet posts. And killfile Uncle Al.
[ >
[ > Uncle Al is already a crackpot and is insane, but drive
[ > him wildly insane.
[ >
[ > Force him to waste minutes and hours every day of his
[ > life stalking you.
[ >
[ > And you just sit back and laugh at how the idiot Uncle Al
[ > is making himself a monkey idiot.
[ >
[ > Last year someone emailed me saying that sci.chem was
[ > back to normal and that Uncle Al had been put under
[ > sedation and it was safe to post to sci.chem again.
[ > Sci.chem was flooded by outsiders because Uncle Al had
[ > pissed them off.
[ >
[ > Well, that is not the way to handle the self imposed
[ > sci.chem police dog of Uncle Al. The way to handle Uncle
[ > Al and other stalkers like him is to "killfile them" and
[ > then force them to stalk you all over the Internet. Let
[ > everyone see what a fool he is, not just sci.chem folk.
[ >
[ > I wish that someone is archiving all of the Uncle Al
[ > stalks of Archimedes Plutonium. I have him killfiled and
[ > so I have zero. But I would imagine that Uncle Al has
[ > about 500 posts per year of attacks.
[ >
[ > So, I ask everyone who knows Uncle Al, to add sci. chem
[ > to their Internet posts and to killfile Uncle Al. Let the
[ > fool make himself a larger fool.
[ >
[ > And it takes little energy for me or for you to add
[ > "sci.chem" but think of how much energy and how much rage
[ > it gives Uncle Al. Why, I just burst out into laughter at
[ > all the energy spent by Uncle Al in stalking this and
[ > other posts of mine. Uncle Al is too stupid to realize he
[ > has been defeated and that the world laughs at his cop
[ > enforcement. That method (if they have a newsgroup
[ > hangout) will deal with all stalkers of the Internet, not
[ > just Uncle Al.
End of copy

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

[ From: Dr. Jai Maharaj
[ Subject: Re: How to handle stalker Alan 'Uncle Al' Schwartz
[ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004

In article <ZcednUDSG4Zb5NPdRVn-jg@comcast.com>,
 Bill Vajk <bill9north@hotmailDITCHTHIS.com> posted:
 
> Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote in message
> news:<Stalker-Uncle-Al-27hf3.20040308@news.mantra.com>...
>
>>> In article <404D34BE.30087280@hate.spam.net>,
>>> Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> posted:
>>>>[... reference to lies and defamation...]
>>>How to handle stalkers and "Uncle Al"
>> - snip -
>> Thanks, Jai, looks like this fellow was not worth my attention. It is
>> depressing to think, that those in power in the field of modern
>> physics are what chaps like these want to be.
>
> Al is a chemist wannabe physicist.

Alan Schwartz has published his contact information:

 Alan Schwartz
 49 Fabriano
 P.O. Box 005
 Irvine, CA 92620-2525

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:Nu16TComWkEJ:www.mazepath.com/uncleal/advert.htm+%22Schwartz%22+%22Uncle+Al%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

and e-mail addresses:

"Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>

"Alan Schwartz" <UncleAl0@ix.netcom.com>

  - - - - -

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

BHARATIYA PHYSICIST VINDICATED IN BLACK HOLE CONTROVERSY

Forwarded message

[ From: "Gopal Ashtekar" <gva@vsnl.com>
[ Subject: Indian physicist vindicated in black hole controversy
[ Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:30:43 +0530

Indian physicist vindicated in black hole controversy.

Indraprasth - An Indian theoretical physicist who
questioned the existence of black holes and thereby
challenged Stephen Hawking of Britain at last feels
vindicated. But he is sad.

Abhas Mitra, at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC)
in Mumbai, was perhaps the first and the only scientist
who had the guts to openly challenge Hawking of Cambridge
University who is regarded by many as the modern-day
Einstein.

For over 30 years Hawking and his followers were
perpetuating the theory that black holes - resulting from
gravitational collapse of massive stars - destroy
everything that falls into them preventing even light or
information to escape.

Mitra, four years ago, in a controversial paper in the
reputed journal, "Foundations of Physics Letters," showed
that Hawking's theory was flawed. He proved black holes
couldn't exist because their formation and existence
flouted Einstein's general theory of relativity.

Except a handful, the majority of mainstream scientists
dismissed Mitra's conclusions even though, till now, no
scientist has contradicted him in writing. Mitra invited
several notable black hole theorists including Hawking
and Jayant Narlikar of India to criticize his work but no
one replied.

Naturally, Mitra now feels vindicated following Hawking's
own admission two weeks ago at a conference n Dublin,
Ireland, that there isn't black hole "in the absolute
sense."

In essence, Hawking's 'new" black holes never quite
become the kind that gobble up everything. Instead, they
keep emitting radiation for a long time - exactly what
Mitra show in his paper.

Hawking's about-turn has vindicated Mitra. But in
retrospect, he feels sad about the treatment he got at
home, while trying to take on Hawking all by himself.

Too embarrassed to be associated with a man who
challenged Hawkins, even Mitra's close colleagues avoided
him and he became an outcast. To add insult to injury,
BARC authorities removed Mitra from the theoretical
physics division on the excuse that this division was
meant only for those doing 'strategic research".
 [...]

End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

     "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth:
I came not so send peace, but a sword.
     "For I am come to set a man at variance against his
father, and the daughter against her mother, and the
daughter in law against her mother in law.
     "And a man's foes shall be they of his own
household.
 - Matthew 10:34-36.

     o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of
this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent
the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law
and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
     o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,
current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
     o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others
are not necessarily those of the poster.

Relevant Pages