Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly
From: Lil' Bobby Gortician (master_at_mason.snuh)
Date: 08/11/04
- Next message: Sir Cumference: "Re: Does anyone still believe a 757 hit the Pentagon?"
- Previous message: Sir Cumference: "Re: Does anyone still believe a 757 hit the Pentagon?"
- In reply to: George: "Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly"
- Next in thread: Sir Cumference: "Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Aug 2004 22:17:37 GMT
gblack@hnpl.net (George) wrote in
news:9b937279.0408111348.1e141191@posting.google.com:
> "Lil' Bobby Gortician" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> news:<Xns9541E08EE1A48spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
>> gblack@hnpl.net (George) wrote in
>> news:9b937279.0408101858.43e40f68@posting.google.com:
>>
>> > "Hans \"Mark\" Moleman" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
>> > news:<Xns9541B62B7912Espamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
>> >> Sir Cumference <radiodaze@mailcity.moc> wrote in
>> >> news:fZSdnSPm_YLb14TcRVn- pg@gbronline.com:
>> >>
>> >> > Hans "Mark" Moleman wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> No "dozens" of anything saw an impact. Please post proof of this
>> >> >> hearsay evidence.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And you are ignoring the physical evidence, which is far more
>> >> >> important.
>> >> >
>> >> > It has already been posted here, so look it up stupid.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You certainly proved your case nicely. Congratulations.
>> >>
>> >
>> > It works like this. You have to present your proof as you are making
>> > the allegation.
>>
>> Ok. I have.
>>
>>
>> No 757 Hit The Pentagon
>> http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
>>
>> ASCE Report Proves No 757 Hit The Pentagon
>> http://www.bedoper.com/pentagon/asce
>>
>>
>>
>> > There was wreckage from an aircraft in the Pentagon
>>
>>
>>
>> From a 757?
>
> American Airlines flight 77 (Boeing 757), Washington-Los Angeles:
> 8:20: The plane took off from Dulles International Airport.
> 9:25: NORAD was notified that the plane may have been
> hijacked. 9:25: The FAA shut down all air traffic in the
> country. 9:35: Three F-16 Fighting Falcons took off.
> 9:37: The plane was lost from radar screens.
> 9:38: The plane struck the Pentagon.
And that somehow establishes the debris as 757 debris?
>
> If you get away from the conspiracy wackos there is a lot of
> information on the Net regarding these attacks.
>
> http://www.newsfollowup.com/data/pntgn1.pdf
>
> Speed of aircraft
> http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/PDFfiles/Chapter%20III%20Aircraft%20speed.p
> df
How does the speed of the aircraft matter, if no physical evidence points
to a 757?
> There are a couple of nonwacko reports on parts of the attack.
> Use the Internet. Look for the Accident reports. Look for the seating
> plans of the aircraft and the accident reports that are still reported
> as crime scenes...
What does the seating chart have to do with anything at all?
> Read the eyewitness testimonies of what they saw...
I have. It doesn't correlate with the physical evidence:
No 757 Hit The Pentagon
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
ASCE Report Proves No 757 Hit The Pentagon
http://www.bedoper.com/pentagon/asce
-- http://BeDoper.com - BeOS and a hell of a lot more Virgin Message Board http://bedoper.com/cgi-bin/plugins/BBS/bedoper_ubb/Ultimate.cgi? action=intro
- Next message: Sir Cumference: "Re: Does anyone still believe a 757 hit the Pentagon?"
- Previous message: Sir Cumference: "Re: Does anyone still believe a 757 hit the Pentagon?"
- In reply to: George: "Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly"
- Next in thread: Sir Cumference: "Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
