Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?
From: Androcles (androc1es_at_nospamblueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 08/12/04
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: DiracDelta potential"
- Previous message: Lil' Bobby Gortician: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- In reply to: Henri Wilson: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 07:59:56 GMT
"Henri Wilson" <h@..> wrote in message
news:2p5lh01qaeh29ct6splo39av0u271st553@4ax.com...
| Most variables are single stars in orbit around a large dark object.
Dammit, H, NO!
I've told you this before, but it hasn't sunk in yet. Pay attention!
Most variable stars are a single star being orbited BY a large PLANET.
The star's own orbit about a common centre, counterbalancing the planet, is
less than the star's own diameter.
There is no need to conjure up "large dark objects" bigger than the star
itself. Heck, do the math instead of dreaming up large dark objects!
You've already got a program to do it for you, so figure out the SMALLEST
orbit that will produce variability.
Androcles.
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: DiracDelta potential"
- Previous message: Lil' Bobby Gortician: "Re: No 757 Hit the Pentagon Re: Four More Years of Murder"
- In reply to: Henri Wilson: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
