Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max"
From: George Hammond (research444_at_comcast.net)
Date: 08/12/04
- Next message: BllFs6: "Clever Idea - Quantum Entanglemet for Space Propulsion"
- Previous message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: EXPOSED: Lying scum Alan Schwartz aka 'Uncle Al' <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> (Was: Re: ANOTHER WEIRD PHYSICS QUESTION)"
- Next in thread: Rick Cvejic: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: Rick Cvejic: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: John Prester: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: Lemming: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: Lemming: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:39:11 GMT
NOTE: I am grateful to Mr. Schornak of Augsburg for his
reply. I am posting this to de.sci.physik because
I think it is of interest to German physicists.
"bv_schornak" <nowhere@schornak.de> wrote in
message news:cf8sam$cuj$02$1@news.t-online.com...
> George Hammond (M.S. Physics 1967) wrote:
<snip>
[Hammond]
> >This misunderstanding on your part is simply caused by the
> >fact that you don't comprehend the BASIC LOGICAL PRINCIPLE
> >of the theory. I think we should discuss this
[Schornak]
> Ok, let's try it.
[Schornak]
> >>There's only one reality: The Universe (or Nature). Your
> >>"absolute physical" and "human perceptual" reality isn't
> >>reality _itself_, it's an interpretation of reality.
[Hammond]
OK Bernie (if I may)... this is where we have to start
talking.
Einstein's Theory of Gravity begins by pointing out
something that is entirely obvious.. Einstein pointed out
that "gravity" is identical to "acceleration", and therefore
that gravity could be explained by a theory of "acceleration".
This "acceleration" turns out to be caused by a "curvature
of spacetime". OK, when Einstein pointed that out, the
term "acceleration of gravity" was already WELL KNOWN to
everyone... in other words Einstein just pointed out the
SIGNIFICANCE of something that was ALREADY WELL KNOWN!
The scientific proof of God that I have discovered is
based on exactly the same kind of circumstance... it begins
by pointing out the SIGNIFICANCE of something that is
ALREADY WELL KNOWN, and then deduces from that a scientific
explanation of God!
Now, the first thing you have to know in order to understand
Hammond's scientific proof of God is this "well known fact
who's significance has not been realized". This fact is:
Founding Fact of Hammond's
Scientific Proof of God
No person, past or present, in the history of the
world has EVER reached full growth. People are
getting more fully grown with each passing generation
and this is called the "Secular Trend" in human
growth, and is a well known scientific fact. Modern
soldiers for instance cannot fit into a medieval suit
of armor since we are so much bigger than our ancestors.
This is commonly described as the difference between our
"phenotype" and our "genotype". By studying Third World
growth stunting, and measuring ancient skeletons, it can
be estimated that Man is at present (on average) maybe
85% of his full genotypic size. Estimating this is
exactly the same problem as trying to estimate the
"theoretical human life span". Incidentally, since
our bodies are only, say, 85% grown... our BRAINS are
only 85% grown also.
OK... so this is the WELL KNOWN FACT that I referred
to above. What I've simply done is to point out the
SIGNIFICANCE of this well known fact.. by showing that
it leads directly to scientific explanation of "God".
OK, so the NEW SIGNIFICANCE of this well known fact
is that it can "explain God". How does it do that?
Well, as I pointed out above, it means that 15% of
the human brain is missing (i.e. is only partially grown).
This means that 15% of our "reality" must be missing..
or must be "invisible" to us, to be more exact. Once
this significance is realized... the entire history of
God, religion and theology fall into place like putting
a simple puzzle together: Since 15% of man is invisible,
we have an "invisible man" which is "God". Any "variability"
in the brain growth deficit (such as the sudden lifting of
repression) can cause pent up (repressed) brain growth to
come on line and produce a "miraculous" change in reality..
hence the explanation of miracles. The Secular Trend
itself explains the "kingdom come" of theology... it is
simply the end of the Secular Trend sometime in the future.
Eternal Life is simply a condition of "zero growth deficit"
which will be reached at the end of the Secular Trend...
and on, and on, and on ad infinitem.... EVERY major fact
of religion and theology is SCIENTIFICALLY EXPLAINED
by the "NEW SIGNIFICANCE" of the Secular Trend in human
growth.
OK.... that's the "new significance". But BEYOND THAT,
it turns out this "theory" can actually be PROVED EXPERIMENTALLY
to two decimal point accuracy. This is where you have to have
some scientific training. It turns out that just like "gravity"
is a curvature in spacetime... "God" is a curvature in
Psychometry Space, and in fact:
GOD = G_uv
The reason for this is that:
4D spacetime CAUSES 4D Psychometry Space
Due to the 3D Cartesian cleavage of the Brain.
Anyway... the PROOF has been published in the peer reviewed
scientific literature, and the papers are posted and clearly
explained on my website:
> Greetings from Augsburg
> Bernhard Schornak
Greetings from Hyannis
George Hammond
===========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
============================================
- Next message: BllFs6: "Clever Idea - Quantum Entanglemet for Space Propulsion"
- Previous message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: EXPOSED: Lying scum Alan Schwartz aka 'Uncle Al' <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> (Was: Re: ANOTHER WEIRD PHYSICS QUESTION)"
- Next in thread: Rick Cvejic: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: Rick Cvejic: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: John Prester: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: Lemming: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: Lemming: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Maybe reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|