Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly
From: Kwantem Mekanik (kwantem_at_nospam.net)
Date: 08/12/04
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: QFT Questions"
- Previous message: David Rutherford: "Re: SR inconsistent?"
- In reply to: Lil' Bobby Gortician: "Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly"
- Next in thread: Lil' Bobby Gortician: "Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly"
- Reply: Lil' Bobby Gortician: "Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:58:32 -0600
In article <Xns954393A325E75spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>,
"Lil' Bobby Gortician" <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
> Kwantem Mekanik <kwantem@nospam.net> wrote in
> news:kwantem-3D67DD.12354312082004@news.isp.giganews.com:
>
> > In article <Xns954377948368Espamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>,
> > "Lil' Bobby Gortician" <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
> >
> >> Kwantem Mekanik <kwantem@nospam.net> wrote in news:kwantem-
> >> 76EDAA.07410012082004@news.isp.giganews.com:
> >>
> >> > In article <Xns954316DDCD149spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>,
> >> > "Lil' Bobby Gortician" <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Sir Cumference <radiodaze@mailcity.moc> wrote in
> >> >> news:VvydnRytzpm5Y4fcRVn-og@gbronline.com:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Lil' Bobby Gortician wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Worthless, because it raises more questions than it answers.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> How did one piece near the front of the plane supposedly survive,
> >> given
> >> >> >> the above explanation?
>
>
>
> I brought up the alleged piece of 757 above.
>
>
>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> You can't explain it, can you?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > What is this piece?
> >> >
> >> > How was it determined that it came from the front of the plane?
> >> >
> >> > I await your answer.
> >>
> >>
> >> I don't want to deal with people who are ignorant of the case in
> >> question. Sorry. Do your homework, first.
> >>
> >
> > Oh, I see, you don't actually know then that a piece large enough to
> > identify as coming from the front of the plane was found at the
> > wreckage.
>
> I don't?
>
> Why did I bring it up, then? I asked you why it didn't "disintegrate" along
> with rest of the plane, and why it wasn't even burnt.
>
You made the claim above that a piece large enough to identify as coming
from the front of the plane was found at the wreckage, so it's up to you
to prove it.
You have to show us the reference in an official report that a piece
large enough to identify as coming from the front of the plane was found
at the wreckage.
Otherwise, most of us are going to assume you're fabricating the piece
in your mind.
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: QFT Questions"
- Previous message: David Rutherford: "Re: SR inconsistent?"
- In reply to: Lil' Bobby Gortician: "Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly"
- Next in thread: Lil' Bobby Gortician: "Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly"
- Reply: Lil' Bobby Gortician: "Re: Pentagon 757 Theorists Dry Up And Blow Away, Suddenly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|