Re: KEEP THIS *** OUT OF SCI.PHYSICS

From: Phil Holman (philjud_at_earthlink.not)
Date: 08/15/04 

Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:59:05 GMT

"Lil' Bobby Gortician" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
news:Xns9542E1640203Dspamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
> Eric Gisse <fseggNO!SPAM@uaf.edu> wrote in
> news:vsllh0tnkehfs2kgaoqj3p2j361m7ut3o1@4ax.com:
>
> > [snip]
> >
> > KEEP THIS *** OUT OF SCI.PHYSICS
>
> Why don't you mind your own business? We're discussing the physics of
the
> Pentagon on 9/11.
>
> Can you, a presumed physics buff, explain how the "757"'s engine flew
over
> the Pentagon? Allegedly?

Predicting the pathway of a fused engine is difficult. The IA 747
freighter which lost an inboard engine shortly after take-off from
Amsterdam is an example. The departing engine took out the outboard
engine.
Depending on the sequence of failure of the 5 main attachments, it is
not a simple thing to predict. Trying to figure this out from the
photographic evidence on display would be difficult.

PH