Re: A Small Theory of the Field
From: Igor (thoovler_at_excite.com)
Date: 08/15/04
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: From 3D to 2D"
- Previous message: Justin Lewis: "Re: Tom Potter Factually Challenged (Again)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Aug 2004 05:34:07 -0700
eagleson2004123@yahoo.com wrote in message news:<43d9f575.0408142245.152765c8@posting.google.com>...
> A Theory of the Field in Relation to
> any Content.
>
>
> A partial differential is a function composed of two or more
> independent variable.
>
> For example. y= df/dt + de/dt
>
> and it is the common nonlinear form.
>
> By holding one constant the other may be solved. And
> likewise the other.
>
> In order to solve given the two variables a set of solutions
> is the outcome. An outcome where the set defines the
> possible function.
>
> Implying the function as unsolvable in theory. And given
> no other function to relate one variable to the other, it
> is to remain unsolvable.
>
> A boundary solution is allowed to estimate a certain
> solution. And here the meaning of boundary solution is
> the constant. One function is held fixed.
>
> Implying the relationship of variable to variable as
> a simple linear relation.
>
> And here the assumed means of solution is found incomplete
> in relation to all functions, unless the actual relation
> in theory is a simple linear one.
>
> So take theory in the abstract and state this as the
> general nonlinear function. And write theory to this
> form.
>
> Making the function any function again, and the boundary
> relation as the general relation between all relations.
>
> Hold the speed of light constant and infer the function.
>
> A function of space, time and electric field is found.
>
> A large pondering to search for the variable.
>
> a=de/ds where e is the electric field strength and
> s is a field, in distance.
>
> b=df/dt where f is the field in abstract distance
> and t is the time of relativity's change with field.
>
> And the boundary relation is then s= a + b.
>
> A ring in algebra is stated to formulate.
>
> Abstract field in relation to the particular field
> is the relation of abstract theory. All fields and
> variables related are statable.
>
> A third abstract field equation is stated.
>
> And the constant of vacumn permitivity is one solution
> while the speed of light is the other.
>
> Abstract field is always a constant in relation to
> the boundary variables, by definition in algebra for
> the distance of abstract space is never found in the
> particular.
>
> Implying the solution as the theory applied to state
> the system examined. And here to examine space with
> its contents held constant, relative to space with
> time held constant is the form.
>
> A small theory is stated. In relation to the larger
> it is as useful as the knowledge it predicts.
>
> s = u + c.
>
> And here abstract distance is found related. A
> quandery until the cause of such a condition is
> conforming. A charge is assembled from the effect
> of its existence.
>
> s is the distance of the charge relative to the
> field strength of the charge. An abstract algebra
> relation is stated, s = u + c.
>
> And the term u, vacumn permitivity and the term
> c, speed of light, differ in units by the rings
> necessity.
>
> One is effect while the electric field capacity of
> the vacumn, a strength, is a cause. A necessity in
> abstract theory is this example.
>
> A constant of the relation is always either cause or
> effect, while rings relate only one to the abstract
> of either:)
>
> Douglas Eagleson
> Gaitherbsurg, MD USA
>
> note1: abstract theory is stated in example.
>
> Neutral charge contents are hardly content. An
> example of the incompletness, as it is a small theory.
>
> And the example function's variable time in relation
> to the particular's variables of s and t, define
> abstract theory itself. A variable of common relation
> is apparently abstract time.
>
> And this is the relation of relativity relating
> space to time, by all times alterations.
>
> Abstract time is particularly altered, by nature.
>
> A rare and likely non-repeatable find in theory.
>
> Einstein speaks of all time as the resolution of
> the particular theorys of relativity.
>
> Abstract theory.
>
> note2: His relation is literally impossible to infer
> as a relation of nature. A different person and
> with a different strength of will found it. And
> stated its existence as the resolution of the particulars.
>
> Those being General and Special Relativity.
>
> Abstract time is equal to abstract space. Always.
>
> note3: I used 12 abstractions of theory to discover
> this resolution. Except 10 are simply to repeat
> Einstein's work.
>
> note4: philosophers credit in the fashion of
> this example, abstract theory as a discovery.
>
> I repeated Plato. Personally. Objective theory
> is how many examples resolved? Just one.
>
> note5: philosophers invert theory once it is
> learned, to exclude the realm of objective inquiry
> with a single example.
>
> note6: notes are the context of the discourse.
> And strength of will is a measure of the
> person.
>
> note 7: I always write inverted intentionally.
>
> Five days to write this theory and five hours
> to compose this discourse.
Congratulations! Not a single statement in this post makes any sense.
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: From 3D to 2D"
- Previous message: Justin Lewis: "Re: Tom Potter Factually Challenged (Again)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
