Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits

From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (net_at_nospam.com)
Date: 08/22/04


Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:42:04 -0700

Dear Dale Trynor:

"Dale Trynor" <dalet@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:mS6Wc.98666$Np3.4779450@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
> > Dear Ole D. Rughede:
> >
> > "Ole D. Rughede" <ole.rughede@privat.dk> wrote in message
> > news:412893e1$0$285$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk...
> >
> >>"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> skrev i
en
> >>meddelelse news:qmVVc.1594$L94.1590@fed1read07...
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>>Take your own mind from the 19th century, Freddi!
> >>>You accept quantum theory, so where is the need for
> >>>a pervasive medium, when quantum mechanically,
> >>>there is no volume to be filled?
> >>
> >>David, what do you mean by "no volume to be filled"?
> >>Is space disappearing? Isn't the quantum vacuum filled
> >>with quanta like the ZPE-vacuum was filled with positive
> >>and negative energies? Where in the universe will you
> >>find a true empty vaccum, meaning space without any
> >>mass or energy? The is space-time-energy continuum
> >>is the aether.
> >
> >
> > The spacetime continuum is a statistical illusion. Quantum mechanics
> > doesn't require distance, only yields it up "statistically". No
distance,
> > no volume. No volume no need for aether.
>
> Dale Trynor wrote:
> You must not have seen my postings looking at experimental approaches to
> showing how time can be related to volume and how this in turn is very
> suggestive of a quantum mechanical association.

I hadn't.

> If you dont remember, it was showing how the sort of time dilation one
> gets around black holes and other massive objects to a lesser extent
> must contract matter and all references on length in such a way that
> leads to the measure of more space.

Time is part of spacetime, and is therefore an illusion provided by quantum
interaction.

> Showing the how and why that something like the Casimir plates that
> actually measure propertys of the vacuum, cannot be used as a preferred
> references frame is critical to further support the idea that quantum
> vacuum is directly connection with the volume of space.

The answers that the Casimir plates provide, says little about the space
between them, but lots about the space outside them. So it says little
about the quantum vacuum, but lots about the statistical system in which
the plates are embedded.

David A. Smith



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The TOTAL disproof of Relativity and current QM
    ... > also completely disproves both Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics. ... In general, this is an equation for the *relativistic* mass, ... This is the *definition* of the Compton wavelength! ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: process physics (was Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits)
    ... >The important point he makes is that absolute motion is not incom- ... >different way of understanding the origin of space, the quantum etc. ... >This is far from complete as even Cahill readilly admits. ... I think understanding quantum mechanics in terms ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article
    ... >> specific, a much more direct connection than, say, between quantum ... >> both in quantum mechanics and in NN models of the brain. ... >> establishes correlation (linear algebra used in both places), ... algebra of biological neural networks. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • qm2 highlights 2001-2005
    ... undergrad QM, bell, entanglement, photon experiments ... of existing quantum mechanics theory seeking to resolve ... wolfram/fredkin, physics as information flow ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: process physics (was Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits)
    ... >The important point he makes is that absolute motion is not incom- ... >different way of understanding the origin of space, the quantum etc. ... >This is far from complete as even Cahill readilly admits. ... I think understanding quantum mechanics in terms ...
    (sci.physics)