Re: ASETNIOP Keyboard
From: Old Physics (skearney7_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 08/23/04
- Next message: Jim Greenfield: "Re: 1c+1c Light and matter"
- Previous message: Alas, Babylon: "Re: The Pentagon 9/11 Farce"
- In reply to: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: ASETNIOP Keyboard"
- Next in thread: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: ASETNIOP Keyboard"
- Reply: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: ASETNIOP Keyboard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Aug 2004 19:01:12 -0700
usenet@mantra.com (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote in message news:<VRr7Y99GLKn0@CW556Y6fYuuWKR>...
> In article <13fd3446.0408211640.6d039405@posting.google.com>,
> skearney7@earthlink.net (Old Physics) posted:
> > ASETNIOP Keyboard
> >
> > Different name, same idea.
> > By simply transposing dfjkl; with the letters etniop, a keyboard
> > would be made more than forty percent more efficient, 80% more
> > efficient for the letters transposed. Less transverse motion and more
> > common letters on the home row will result in greater speed, comfort
> > and fewer mistakes.
> > By keeping the letters under the same fingers you will find that
> > etnio and p will be easy to learn, e and t are each more common than
> > dfjkl; combined in normal english text. Dfjkl and ; are harder to get
> > used to, you will be hitting them in their old locations.
> >
> > "Use this test as an exercise, inhibit transverse motion" will
> > come out
> > "Usd fhks fdsf as aj dxdrcksd, kjhkbkf frajsvdrsd mlfklj" on the
> > qwerty keyboard. using text without dfjkl and ; makes it easy to detect
> > mistakes as they will show up as etnio or p in the practice.
> > Christopher Latham Showles originally put e and probably t on the
> > home row under the middle and index fingers of the left hand. This
> > caused a jamming of the key bars on his mechanical typewriter, making
> > for a machine unfriendly typist. This led to our modern version,
> > patented in 1868. Maybe its time to go back to the original design again.
> >
> > Stephen Kearney
>
> The voice-to-text systems I have been using
> over the years have become increasingly accurate to,
> I would say, about 95 percent accuracy. For most
> informal and casual writing by most people, a keyboard
> isn't really necessary. Coming next: thought-to-text systems.
>
> Jai Maharaj
> http://www.mantra.com/jai
> Om Shanti
Can you give any insight as to how a "TtT" system would work?
What kind of interface does it use? Even for person to person,
writing, voice or sign language is universaly necessary for complex
communication.
- Next message: Jim Greenfield: "Re: 1c+1c Light and matter"
- Previous message: Alas, Babylon: "Re: The Pentagon 9/11 Farce"
- In reply to: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: ASETNIOP Keyboard"
- Next in thread: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: ASETNIOP Keyboard"
- Reply: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: ASETNIOP Keyboard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|