Re: Light Big Bang?
From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 08/24/04
- Next message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: PROFILE OF ABUSER ALAN SCHWARTZ aka 'Uncle Al' <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Light Big Bang?"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Re: Light Big Bang?"
- Next in thread: Mitchell: "Re: Light Big Bang?"
- Reply: Mitchell: "Re: Light Big Bang?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:50:22 +0200
Mitchell wrote:
> Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cgcafe$so3$3@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
>
>>Mitchell wrote:
>>
>>>Titan Point <TitanPoint@nospam.net> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.08.21.20.47.16.773000@nospam.net>...
>>>
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>>My proof is in reasoning. If I am reasonable I have done my job right.
>>
>>Hint: about 2500 years ago, the Greek tried to do physics solely
>>by reasoning. They failed.
>>
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>Bye,
>>Bjoern
>
>
> Is that right?
Yes.
> You would like to apply that to me.
Yes.
> My reasoning is about the inherent flaws.
Hint: in order to find "inherent flaws", you first have to
*understand* the theories.
> That is my job.
Then learn the theories first.
> No one has found a flaw in my reasoning yet.
Err, no. You simply refused to acknowledge every single flaw which was
pointed out.
> I am waiting for that.
Open your eyes. The flaws are there. They have been pointed out lots
of times now.
> Nobody can correct My correction of the flaws.
Several people can, and did.
> Just show me where I am wrong Bjoern.
Already done. You refused to listen.
> Can't do it.
Can.
Bye,
Bjoern
- Next message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: PROFILE OF ABUSER ALAN SCHWARTZ aka 'Uncle Al' <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Light Big Bang?"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Re: Light Big Bang?"
- Next in thread: Mitchell: "Re: Light Big Bang?"
- Reply: Mitchell: "Re: Light Big Bang?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
