Re: Hammond sees the obvious?
From: Goran Dhemmeog (hcraeser731_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/26/04
- Next message: Satya Das: "Re: Proof of absolute truth"
- Previous message: Erik Max Francis: "Re: Durability of materials in space"
- In reply to: Scot McDermid: "Re: Hammond sees the obvious?"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Hammond sees the obvious?"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: Hammond sees the obvious?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Aug 2004 01:59:06 -0700
"Scot McDermid" <scotmc@optNOSPAMonline.net> wrote in message news:<296Xc.1512$ZD4.2516225@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> Some sects of Buddhism have a God. Or at least "there is a sort
> of God in there" just like a close association between God
> and he eternal Tao.
Yes, but George says that it is "an invisible man". There are all
sorts of references to gods, or other higher beings in the sutras, but
buddhists seremonies do no include worship to them.
Of course, George also claims to "know" the true meaning of the koans
'tree falling in the forest' and 'the sound of one hand clapping'. I
wonder what he says about 'Does a dog have a Buddha mind? Answer yes,
or answer no, and you lose your Buddha mind.'
- Next message: Satya Das: "Re: Proof of absolute truth"
- Previous message: Erik Max Francis: "Re: Durability of materials in space"
- In reply to: Scot McDermid: "Re: Hammond sees the obvious?"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Hammond sees the obvious?"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: Hammond sees the obvious?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|