Re: Yes Science Needs God
From: Eric Gisse (fsegg_at_!SPAMuaf.edu)
Date: 08/26/04
- Next message: Russell Wallace: "Re: Durability of materials in space"
- Previous message: djamel: "Re: Science and God."
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:28:25 -0800
On 26 Aug 2004 12:11:38 -0700, macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell)
wrote:
>"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:<2p5pudFgddgiU3@uni-berlin.de>...
>> Mitchell wrote:
>> > Science says a mindless lump created this universe. But who created
>> > that so called "singularity?" Science won't admit God even when faced
>> > with Him.
>> > Mitch Raemsch
>>
>> And which God created God. Did He create himself? The concept is
>> empirically unsuportable, there for it must be expelled from science.
>>
>> Bob Kolker
>
>The universe needs to be created. That is obvious. God doesn't.
>Your just another slimeball atheist trying to leave God out.
>Well you can't.
Why does god not suffer the need to be created like the universe?
Saying that the universe must be created but god must not derails your
logic train.
OT: Stupid train decides to STOP after ~50 cars pass me, but leaves 2
left. Get off the bus after several minutes of waiting, then I walk
around the train, and get 20 feet before the fucking thing starts to
move again. Rrrr.
>
>Tell me that a mindless lump is responsible for the intelligence
>behind the universe(science).
>Just try it. You'll make a fool out of yourself.
>
>Mitch Raemsch
> -- Light Falls --
- Next message: Russell Wallace: "Re: Durability of materials in space"
- Previous message: djamel: "Re: Science and God."
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]