Re: Yes Science Needs God

From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 08/28/04 

Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:44:37 GMT

"Eric Gisse" <fsegg@!SPAMuaf.edu> wrote in message
news:6dssi0t7s8c1gbjfmjuuodbitt83raapdh@4ax.com...
> On 26 Aug 2004 12:11:38 -0700, macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell)
> wrote:
>
> >"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:<2p5pudFgddgiU3@uni-berlin.de>...
> >> Mitchell wrote:
> >> > Science says a mindless lump created this universe. But who created
> >> > that so called "singularity?" Science won't admit God even when faced
> >> > with Him.
> >> > Mitch Raemsch
> >>
> >> And which God created God. Did He create himself? The concept is
> >> empirically unsuportable, there for it must be expelled from science.
> >>
> >> Bob Kolker
> >
> >The universe needs to be created. That is obvious. God doesn't.
> >Your just another slimeball atheist trying to leave God out.
> >Well you can't.
>
> Why does god not suffer the need to be created like the universe?
> Saying that the universe must be created but god must not derails your
> logic train.

Exactly as Bertrand Russell (and probably many others prior to him) pointed
out - the non existence of God is more in line with cause and effect.

Thanks
Bill

>
> OT: Stupid train decides to STOP after ~50 cars pass me, but leaves 2
> left. Get off the bus after several minutes of waiting, then I walk
> around the train, and get 20 feet before the fucking thing starts to
> move again. Rrrr.
>
> >
> >Tell me that a mindless lump is responsible for the intelligence
> >behind the universe(science).
> >Just try it. You'll make a fool out of yourself.
> >
> >Mitch Raemsch
> > -- Light Falls --
>