Re: The MARGINAL Cost of Two More Cassini Craft (Re: Pluto Flyby)
From: Paul Blay (ranma_at_saotome.demon.co.uk)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: Oriel36: "Re: The horrible failure of science education"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner?"
- In reply to: Sander Vesik: "Re: The MARGINAL Cost of Two More Cassini Craft (Re: Pluto Flyby)"
- Next in thread: Sander Vesik: "Re: The MARGINAL Cost of Two More Cassini Craft (Re: Pluto Flyby)"
- Reply: Sander Vesik: "Re: The MARGINAL Cost of Two More Cassini Craft (Re: Pluto Flyby)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:05:15 +0100
"Sander Vesik" wrote ...
> In sci.space.policy Stefan Dobrev <hot_esteban@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> What about getting into orbit that frequently crosses the rings?
>> Close-ups of the rings would be spectacular. And we might get lucky to
>> get a couple of crossings before it finally hits something.
>
> Why contaminate the rings with manmade grabage?
Do the maths.
According to my WAG "drop in the ocean" would be overstating the matter.
It isn't as if there's the potential of affecting local lifeforms.
- Next message: Oriel36: "Re: The horrible failure of science education"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner?"
- In reply to: Sander Vesik: "Re: The MARGINAL Cost of Two More Cassini Craft (Re: Pluto Flyby)"
- Next in thread: Sander Vesik: "Re: The MARGINAL Cost of Two More Cassini Craft (Re: Pluto Flyby)"
- Reply: Sander Vesik: "Re: The MARGINAL Cost of Two More Cassini Craft (Re: Pluto Flyby)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
