Re: do photons interact with gravitons?
From: Ole D. Rughede (ole.rughede_at_privat.dk)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: Bango Skank: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: Article: A Century of Einstein"
- In reply to: Ole D. Rughede: "Re: do photons interact with gravitons?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:55:56 +0200
"Ole D. Rughede" <ole.rughede@privat.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
news:4133f728$0$228$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk...
>
> "zigoteau" <zigoteau@ausi.com> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:9da9cba1.0408300936.5e59c6e4@posting.google.com...
> > "Ole D. Rughede" <ole.rughede@privat.dk> wrote in message
> news:<413223b4$0$281$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk>...
> >
Correction:
-----------
At present I tentatively assume: y = x(x+1)/2x and
z^2 = (x + 1). Future experiments must show better.
Read:
------
At present I tentatively assume: y = x(x+1)/2x and
z^2 = 2x(x + 1). Future experiments must show better.
Written faulty in late night hours. I regret.
-----------------------------------------
As regards the neutrino problem, we touched, I made
a note September 11th 1999, "On the Mass-Radiation
Relation of the Aether Field", about the efficiency (or
work-rate) of the Sun's energy production, finding at
that time E' = L' - phi(Sun) = 3.86 - 1.991)E33 =
1.87E33 erg/sec at an efficiency epsilon = E'/M(Sun)
= 0.939 (erg/sec)/g comparable to an expected
efficiency epsilon about 1.
This to compare with the solar constant in relation to the
mass of the Sun M = 1.991E33 g at a flux of efficincy
phi/M = 1 (erg/sec)/g, and L'/M about 1.94 (erg/sec)/g,
if L' = 3.86E33 erg/sec should be the output from the Sun
The result would indicate a loss in efficiency about 6%,
probably according to some flattening curve in time,
maybe with peculiar transits mirroring changes in different
atom building processes in the Sun.
I noted that the difficult measurements of mass-less
neutrinos from the Sun's energy production, then about
1/3 of what was expected to find, in fact would rater be
better as 2/3 of expectation, and presumeably could get
in complete agreement after a revision of the Sun model.
The temperature gradient of the corona another problem:
I assumed a gain in gravitational energy from the Aether
phi(Sun) and an irradiation L' = phi(Sun) + E' with a
nett contribution to the Aether of E' erg/sec through the
convection zone coronar plasma, where I assume that
free electrons and fewer positive ions are driven intensly
in a back-and-forth dance due to scattering and radiation
pressure. Especially the electrons would thus gain extreme
velocities and temperatures before any recombination of
the plama constituents may occur in greater distances
from the Sun at lower particle velocities and plasma-
-magnetic field-strengths.
This all, of course, quite tentatively, just for the sake of
some ideas to revert to some time of better analysis.
You may not rely seriously on these primitive thoughts,
where K = 2.000343E3 is not considered.
We have these strange properties of Majorama neutrinos
with imaginary intrinsic parity, and should on the other hand
be able to destinguish between Majorama- and Dirac-
neutrinos from their electromagnetic properties. But neutrinos
are, of course, electrically neutral. - Dirac's perhaps with a
nonvanishing magnetic dipole moment, Majorama's, however,
with vanishing dipole moments.
I would be happy to have your best present references to
the state of empirical results.
Ole D. Rughede
- Next message: Bango Skank: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: Article: A Century of Einstein"
- In reply to: Ole D. Rughede: "Re: do photons interact with gravitons?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
