Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon

From: 1aircraftQAguy (glennab1_at_aol.com)
Date: 08/31/04 

Date: 31 Aug 2004 13:37:36 -0700

"Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message news:<ff%Yc.29395$Es2.11882070@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in message
> news:cgvoip$e5t$0@pita.alt.net...
> >
> > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> > news:UvJYc.23304$Es2.8833169@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> >
> > > Are you speaking of the AE Drive punch out?
> >
> > The technical explanation of it is quite simple and clear, and spelled out
> > in the ASCE report you won't read.
>
> Wrong, you are well aware that I have read it. Your claim is bull*** as has
> been pointed out time and again. This is the only reason you refuse to post
> the text from this
> ASCE that specifically details how the columns between the AC and the AE
> Drive punch out were left with no significant damage.

I've already told you. The explosive pressure.

> > In fact, all of your "unanswered questions" are pretty much addressed
> there.
> > Not that you care, but folks who are more interested in finding out what
> > happened than they are in helping you attract attention to yourself will
> > easily figure it out.
>
> More kooky claims. The ASCE Building Performance report doesn't answer 10%
> of the "unanswered questions" surrounding 11

You're the kook! Why would anyone expect a civil engineering building
performance report to answer all questions surrounding 11 September
2001.

Quantcast