Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon
From: 1aircraftQAguy (glennab1_at_aol.com)
Date: 09/02/04
- Next message: EjP: "SETI@home dismisses signal"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: "The Einstein Hoax ""
- In reply to: lensman1955: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Next in thread: C-Fresh: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Reply: C-Fresh: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 2 Sep 2004 09:22:28 -0700
lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955) wrote in message news:<633b063b.0409020213.279dc58b@posting.google.com>...
> "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in message news:<ch5t4c$bs3$0@pita.alt.net>...
> > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> > news:bDuZc.38817$Es2.17115355@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> > >
> > > "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in message
> > > news:ch3a8u$gu8$0@pita.alt.net...
> > > >
> > > > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:fL9Zc.33379$Es2.13665564@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Bango Skank" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> > > > > news:Xns9556C4FC0F435spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
> > > > > > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in
> news:h_6Zc.32762
> > > > > > $Es2.13130332@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:ch2p3r$5sa$0@pita.alt.net...
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > >> news:5C5Zc.32102$Es2.12878616@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > I know, I know. I am seriously considering getting absolved.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Still answering your own posts?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > So you admit not having ever posted the words in the ASCE report
> that
> > > > > > > specifically detail how the columns between the AC and the AE
> > Drive
> > Punch
> > > > > > > Out were not significantly damaged after all. It would be to much
> typing.
> > > > > > > That makes you a kooky liar.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > He could view it as HTML, and then copy and paste it. The problem
> > is,
> > no
> > > > > > such explanation is given.
> > > > >
> > > > > Umm, yes you are correct.
> > > >
> > > > You mean, "I are correct", don't you?
> > >
> > > Are you not taking medication for your ailments?
> > >
> > > Post the words from the ASCE report that specifically detail how the
> columns
> > > between the AC and the AE Drive Punch Out were not significantly damaged.
> >
> > Already asked and answered. Stop repeating yourself.
>
>
> OK, to play devil's advocate, this thread is so mired down in
> nonsense, it's almost impossible to wade through. If the question has
> been asked and answered would it be possible to give a link to the
> answer? Also, I believe a 757 hit the Pentagon. I think angles and
> security camera distortion could explain why the plane in the now
> famous picture (sorry, no link, but that's an easy one to find) looks
> too short. But I would like to know what the "non-missile" answer is
> to the smoke trail below the fuselage.
With two big vacuum cleaners running at high power just above the
ground...... there had to have been serious FOD. (That's Engines, and
Foreign Object Damage.)
- Next message: EjP: "SETI@home dismisses signal"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: "The Einstein Hoax ""
- In reply to: lensman1955: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Next in thread: C-Fresh: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Reply: C-Fresh: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
