Re: Balls of Napoleon
From: Maleki (maleki_m__at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/28/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: best notebook for physics"
- Previous message: Martin Hogbin: "Re: How Can I Become An Expert Anti-Relativist?"
- In reply to: Mohammed Farooq: "Re: Balls of Napoleon"
- Next in thread: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: Balls of Napoleon"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:19:10 -0500
On 28 Sep 2004 10:24:25 -0700, Mohammed Farooq wrote:
> "Look at the figure caption for Fig. 1-6 in your text. It shows the 1
> kg standard of mass and describes it as a "cylinder 39 cm in height
> and in diameter."
>
> This has got to be crazy - right ? If it were a cylinder of these
> dimensions and had the density of water - how much would it weigh ? Do
> you think the author mixed up cm and mm ? "
When I'm reading it in a standard text of physics, first
thought that comes in my mind is that the cylinder is hollow
of course. If I'm to doubt, typographically, every figure
that the book gives how could I continue reading it?
--
sad sokhan migoft zAn darde kohan
dar shekAyat ke nagoftam yek sokhan
"Mowlana"
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: best notebook for physics"
- Previous message: Martin Hogbin: "Re: How Can I Become An Expert Anti-Relativist?"
- In reply to: Mohammed Farooq: "Re: Balls of Napoleon"
- Next in thread: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: Balls of Napoleon"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|