Re: Is light a wave or a particle?
From: TomGee (lvlus_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/28/04
- Next message: Evgenij Barsukov: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Previous message: tadchem: "Re: Balls of Napoleon"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is light a wave or a particle?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is light a wave or a particle?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is light a wave or a particle?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Sep 2004 13:37:20 -0700
Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cjbb30$45l$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> TomGee wrote:
> > Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<ciu6h9$o9t$2@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> >
> >>TomGee wrote:
> >>
> >>>Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cirkct$6cn$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> >
> >>>and lo & B-hole guess what I found there? The very same
> >>>complaints I made to you about teachers. You remember, the ones which
> >>>you rejected out of hand as if they were untrue accusations which do
> >>>not occur in the hallowed halls of learning.
> >>
> >>Huh? Which teachers did I reject out of hand???
> >>
> >>
> > My Gawd, you have lost any sense of comprehension whatsoever! I
> > referred to the complaints I made to you, not about any teachers.
>
> "the ones" in your sentence above could just as easily refer
> to "teachers" as to "complaints".
>
> And anyway, which complaints did you made to me about teachers?
>
>
No, not true. One cannot reject teachers "as if they were untrue
accusations..." But now I understand your problem; it has to do with
English not being your primary language. With such a handicap, why do
you not slow down in your reading so as to try to not miss any words
or to try to correctly understand what is being said? You keep
wasting people's time with your misreadings and miscomprehensions.
>
>
> > and you should join Tadchem your
> > buddy in starting a new ng for Theoretical Physics.
>
> Not needed. Theoretical physics can be nicely discussed in
> sci.physics.research,
>
>
Oh, yes, I forgot to mention them, too. You have every right to be
there, so don't let them throw you out (if that's not the reason you
are posting here). That is where you belong, your buddies are there.
This ng is not for you, you're too smart for us, too much math
involved which is way over our heads. Go there, my son, and be
welcomed with open arms - you all deserve each other!
>
>
> without any morons like you, who do not
> even understand "inversely proportional", "force", "work" and
> "energy" properly, interrupting.
>
>
There, see how much more you know than any of us here? Go in peace,
my son.
> Bye,
TomGee
- Next message: Evgenij Barsukov: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Previous message: tadchem: "Re: Balls of Napoleon"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is light a wave or a particle?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is light a wave or a particle?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is light a wave or a particle?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|