Re: Elementary thermodynamics question

From: José Carlos Santos (jcsantos_at_fc.up.pt)
Date: 09/29/04


Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:12:22 +0100

Paul Draper wrote:

>> > This is still not enough information. If the room is full of air, the
>> > heat transfer rate to an ice sphere is still actually quite low
>> > COMPARED TO the thermal conductivity of the ice, depending on the
>> > temperature of the air. Is the air warmer than the melting point of
>> > water?
>>
>> Yes, the air is warmer than the melting point of water.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jose Carlos Santos
>
> OK, then you've got a complicated problem, much more than originally
> posed.
> 1. Heat will be transferred to the ice from the gas. You could use the
> specific heat of ice but this will only work if heat is being
> transferred VERY VERY slowly by lowering the pressure of the air or
> reducing the temperature difference to a very small number.
> 2. More realistically, heat will have to conduct through the ice from
> the outside to the inside, and so you'll have a temperature gradient
> across the ice, from surface to center.
> 3. However, as soon as the temperature of the surface of the ice gets
> to 0C, then the temperature at the surface will stop rising and some
> of the heat transfer to the ice will go to melting the ice at a rate
> calculable from the latent heat of fusion of water.
> 4. Meanwhile, however, the ice will still continue to approach thermal
> equilibrium, with the remaining heat transfer flowing inward to lower
> the temperature gradient.
> 5. Meanwhile, however, the ice that does change to water will drip off
> the sphere and fall to the bottom of the container, and now the mass
> of the ice will change, altering in real time your caculation in step
> (1). If you are operating in zero-gravity, at the most ideal, you have
> a sphere of ice inside a shell of water, and now you have to worry
> about heat conduction through two materials and a (different)
> temperature gradient across each one.
> 6. The ice that has melted continues to absorb heat from the
> surrounding gas, but with a different specific heat (that of water,
> not ice). Moreover, the temperature gradient in the water is
> complicated by the fact that it is a fluid and so convection is now a
> real contributor to heat flow within the water.
>
> Honestly, I don't know how to realistically calculate this without a
> stepping computer program that can simulate the processes
> incrementally and simultaneously.
>
> Now if you have a ball of ice at -15 C and a surrounding gas at -5 C,
> then I think my exponential solution earlier posted will approximate
> quite well.

OK. Thanks a lot.

Best regards,

Jose Carlos Santos



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Ice versus water in cooler?
    ... how fast the temperature of the beer reaches the desired point. ... The new ice can absorb a _fixed_ amount of heat from the surroundings, ... dump the water, and use the ice to cool -only_ the bear. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: Instant Cooling to 35deg.F
    ... for removing heat is the phase change happening at the surface of the ice. ... Air is an excellent thermal insulator. ... The advantage of water: it is a better conductor of heat than air (although I ...
    (alt.home.repair)
  • Re: Solution to global warming
    ... Europe why don't the build a pipeline to pump water that's been ... generated from the melted ice to the centre of the ice caps where ... heat emitted as radiation, even if that heat ever reached space. ... temperature of sea water (at a particular salinity. ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)
  • Re: Venus terraforming?
    ... Water ice very effectively insulates upward flow of heat - but does not ... bottom and remelt the CO2. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
  • Re: the ice approaching Australia
    ... much faster rate of melting than that in still water. ... temperature gradient between the ice and water boundary would be ... stripped away by water movement. ... Thereby revealing a new ice surface ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)